linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS4 clients cannot reclaim locks
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:46:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285966000.4391.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25362267.86.1285932646433.JavaMail.sprabhu@dhcp-1-233.fab.redhat.com>

On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 07:30 -0400, Sachin Prabhu wrote:
> NFS4 clients appear to have problems reclaiming locks after a server reboot. I can recreate the issue on 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64 on a Fedora system. 
> 
> The problem appears to happen in cases where after a reboot, a WRITE call is made just before the RENEW call. In that case, the NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID is returned for the WRITE call which results in NFS_STATE_RECLAIM_REBOOT being set in the state flags. However the NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID returned for the subsequent RENEW call is handled by 
> nfs4_recovery_handle_error() -> nfs4_state_end_reclaim_reboot(clp);  
> which ends up setting the state flag to NFS_STATE_RECLAIM_NOGRACE and clearing the NFS_STATE_RECLAIM_REBOOT in nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_nograce(). 

Yup. I don't think we should call nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_reboot() here.

> The process of reclaiming the locks then seem to hit another roadblock in nfs4_open_expired() where it fails to open the file and reset the state. It ends up calling nfs4_reclaim_locks() in a loop with the old stateid in nfs4_reclaim_open_state().

Any idea how nfs4_open_expired() is failing? It seems that if it does,
we should see an error, which would cause the lock reclaim to fail.

Also, why is the call to nfs4_reclaim_locks() looping? That too should
exit in case of an error.

> By commenting out the call to nfs4_state_end_reclaim_reboot(clp) in nfs4_recovery_handle_error(), the client was able to handle this particular scenario properly.

We do need to keep the nfs4_state_end_reclaim_reboot() there. Otherwise,
we have a problem if the server reboots again while we're in the middle
of reclaiming state.

Cheers
  Trond

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-01 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <8181361.84.1285932468389.JavaMail.sprabhu@dhcp-1-233.fab.redhat.com>
2010-10-01 11:30 ` NFS4 clients cannot reclaim locks Sachin Prabhu
2010-10-01 20:46   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2010-10-05 15:03   ` Timo Aaltonen
2010-11-22 16:02     ` Timo Aaltonen
     [not found] <18163799.104.1286186355944.JavaMail.sprabhu@dhcp-1-233.fab.redhat.com>
2010-10-04 10:03 ` Sachin Prabhu
2010-10-05 13:37   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-06 15:59     ` Sachin Prabhu
2010-10-05 13:38   ` Trond Myklebust
     [not found] <18697573.14.1286380841649.JavaMail.sprabhu@dhcp-1-233.fab.redhat.com>
2010-10-06 16:01 ` Sachin Prabhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1285966000.4391.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sprabhu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).