From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS4 clients cannot reclaim locks
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 09:38:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286285905.3338.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14582176.106.1286186603313.JavaMail.sprabhu@dhcp-1-233.fab.redhat.com>
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 06:03 -0400, Sachin Prabhu wrote:
> ----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 07:30 -0400, Sachin Prabhu wrote:
> > > NFS4 clients appear to have problems reclaiming locks after a server
> > reboot. I can recreate the issue on 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64 on a
> > Fedora system.
> > >
> > > The problem appears to happen in cases where after a reboot, a WRITE
> > call is made just before the RENEW call. In that case, the
> > NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID is returned for the WRITE call which results in
> > NFS_STATE_RECLAIM_REBOOT being set in the state flags. However the
> > NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID returned for the subsequent RENEW call is
> > handled by
> > > nfs4_recovery_handle_error() -> nfs4_state_end_reclaim_reboot(clp);
> >
> > > which ends up setting the state flag to NFS_STATE_RECLAIM_NOGRACE
> > and clearing the NFS_STATE_RECLAIM_REBOOT in
> > nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_nograce().
> >
> > Yup. I don't think we should call nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_reboot()
> > here.
...Here is the second patch.
Cheers
Trond
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFSv4: Don't call nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_reboot() from error handlers
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
In the case of a server reboot, the state recovery thread starts by calling
nfs4_state_end_reclaim_reboot() in order to avoid edge conditions when
the server reboots while the client is in the middle of recovery.
However, if the client has already marked the nfs4_state as requiring
reboot recovery, then the above behaviour will cause the recovery thread to
treat the open as if it was part of such an edge condition: the open will
be recovered as if it was part of a lease expiration (and all the locks
will be lost).
Fix is to remove the call to nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_reboot from
nfs4_async_handle_error(), and nfs4_handle_exception(). Instead we leave it
to the recovery thread to do this for us.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 ------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 01b4817..74aa54e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ static int nfs4_handle_exception(const struct nfs_server *server, int errorcode,
nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_nograce(clp, state);
goto do_state_recovery;
case -NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID:
- if (state == NULL)
- break;
- nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_reboot(clp, state);
case -NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID:
case -NFS4ERR_EXPIRED:
goto do_state_recovery;
@@ -3493,9 +3490,6 @@ nfs4_async_handle_error(struct rpc_task *task, const struct nfs_server *server,
nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_nograce(clp, state);
goto do_state_recovery;
case -NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID:
- if (state == NULL)
- break;
- nfs4_state_mark_reclaim_reboot(clp, state);
case -NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID:
case -NFS4ERR_EXPIRED:
goto do_state_recovery;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <18163799.104.1286186355944.JavaMail.sprabhu@dhcp-1-233.fab.redhat.com>
2010-10-04 10:03 ` NFS4 clients cannot reclaim locks Sachin Prabhu
2010-10-05 13:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-06 15:59 ` Sachin Prabhu
2010-10-05 13:38 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
[not found] <18697573.14.1286380841649.JavaMail.sprabhu@dhcp-1-233.fab.redhat.com>
2010-10-06 16:01 ` Sachin Prabhu
[not found] <8181361.84.1285932468389.JavaMail.sprabhu@dhcp-1-233.fab.redhat.com>
2010-10-01 11:30 ` Sachin Prabhu
2010-10-01 20:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-05 15:03 ` Timo Aaltonen
2010-11-22 16:02 ` Timo Aaltonen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286285905.3338.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sprabhu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).