From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@redhat.com>,
"Cláudio Martins" <ctpm@ist.utl.pt>,
"Ian Munsie" <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Scott Romanowski" <romansc@us.ibm.com>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: NFS sillyrename side effect
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:32:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287495168.2969.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CBD3D4E.5080305@panasas.com>
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 08:40 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> On 2010-10-18 19:10, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:01:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:53:44 +0100
> >> Cláudio Martins <ctpm@ist.utl.pt> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:48:11 +0100 Cláudio Martins <ctpm@ist.utl.pt> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Section D2 ends with:
> >>>>
> >>>> "The NFS version 4 protocol is stateful, and could actually support
> >>>> delete-on-last-close. Unfortunately there isn't an easy way to do this
> >>>> and remain backwards-compatible with version 2 and 3 accessors."
> >>>>
> >>>> So, theoretically, could one modify the code to selectively disable
> >>>> silly rename on a client, when it knows it is talking v4 with the
> >>>> server?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> BTW, to clarify, I'm assuming a scenario where the server is
> >>> configured to talk v4 only, which I suspect should be common, at least
> >>> when you're relying on v4 kerberos security.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sadly, no...
> >>
> >> The server does generally hold the file open as long as the client has
> >> the file open. So, you could delete the file while nfsd has it open and
> >> everything would probably still work.
> >>
> >> Suppose though that the server crashes and reboots. When it comes back
> >> up, fsck figures out that the file has been unlinked and frees the
> >> blocks on the disk. Now you can't reclaim the state on the open file.
> >>
> >> We're pretty much stuck with silly-renaming even for v4.
> >
> > The server could do something like rename the file into a special
> > directory somewhere
>
> The clients can do something similar too, like sillyrenaming the
> files onto <mountpoint>/.unlinked_while_opened.<client-id>
> Removing this directory when it empties.
This would require access, directory create, and delete permissions for
the directory '<mountpoint>/', which is not always a given.
Besides, what if the server reboots, and my clientid changes?
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-19 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-18 1:20 NFS sillyrename side effect Ian Munsie
2010-10-18 14:10 ` Jeff Layton
2010-10-18 14:48 ` Cláudio Martins
2010-10-18 14:53 ` Cláudio Martins
2010-10-18 15:01 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20101018110138.5f5001eb-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-18 15:44 ` Cláudio Martins
2010-10-18 16:21 ` Lyle Seaman
2010-10-18 17:00 ` Cláudio Martins
2010-10-18 17:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-19 6:40 ` Benny Halevy
2010-10-19 13:32 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2010-10-21 17:50 ` Benny Halevy
2010-10-21 18:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-21 18:28 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <20101018101059.574b715a-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-19 5:18 ` Ian Munsie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1287495168.2969.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=ctpm@ist.utl.pt \
--cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romansc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).