From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/18] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_hdr refcount to atomic_t
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:22:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288884151-11128-10-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288884151-11128-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>
This is needed because we need to increment the refcount outside
of the i_lock. In particular, we will need to scan cl_layouts
while holding cl_lock, and grab reference of each lo found.
Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index a2d8d3f..d9a867f 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -232,34 +232,42 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver);
* pNFS client layout cache
*/
+/* Need to hold i_lock if caller does not already hold reference */
static void
-get_layout_hdr_locked(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
+get_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
{
- assert_spin_locked(&lo->inode->i_lock);
- lo->refcount++;
+ atomic_inc(&lo->plh_refcount);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
+}
+
+static void
+destroy_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
+{
+ dprintk("%s: freeing layout cache %p\n", __func__, lo);
+ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&lo->layouts));
+ NFS_I(lo->inode)->layout = NULL;
+ kfree(lo);
}
static void
put_layout_hdr_locked(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
{
assert_spin_locked(&lo->inode->i_lock);
- BUG_ON(lo->refcount == 0);
-
- lo->refcount--;
- if (!lo->refcount) {
- dprintk("%s: freeing layout cache %p\n", __func__, lo);
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&lo->layouts));
- NFS_I(lo->inode)->layout = NULL;
- kfree(lo);
- }
+ BUG_ON(atomic_read(&lo->plh_refcount) == 0);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lo->plh_refcount))
+ destroy_layout_hdr(lo);
}
void
put_layout_hdr(struct inode *inode)
{
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
- put_layout_hdr_locked(NFS_I(inode)->layout);
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(inode)->layout;
+
+ BUG_ON(atomic_read(&lo->plh_refcount) == 0);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&lo->plh_refcount, &inode->i_lock)) {
+ destroy_layout_hdr(lo);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ }
}
static void
@@ -413,7 +421,7 @@ pnfs_destroy_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
pnfs_clear_lseg_list(lo, &tmp_list, &range);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&nfsi->layout->segs));
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&nfsi->layout->layouts));
- WARN_ON(nfsi->layout->refcount != 1);
+ WARN_ON(atomic_read(&nfsi->layout->plh_refcount) != 1);
/* Matched by refcount set to 1 in alloc_init_layout_hdr */
put_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
@@ -657,7 +665,7 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
if (should_free_lseg(lseg, &arg))
mark_lseg_invalid(lseg, &tmp_list);
/* Reference matched in nfs4_layoutreturn_release */
- get_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
+ get_layout_hdr(lo);
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
pnfs_free_lseg_list(&tmp_list);
@@ -738,7 +746,7 @@ pnfs_insert_layout(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
__func__, lseg, lseg->range.iomode,
lseg->range.offset, lseg->range.length);
}
- get_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
+ get_layout_hdr(lo);
dprintk("%s:Return\n", __func__);
}
@@ -751,7 +759,7 @@ alloc_init_layout_hdr(struct inode *ino)
lo = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pnfs_layout_hdr), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!lo)
return NULL;
- lo->refcount = 1;
+ atomic_set(&lo->plh_refcount, 1);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->layouts);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->segs);
lo->inode = ino;
@@ -875,7 +883,7 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
if (test_bit(lo_fail_bit(iomode), &nfsi->layout->plh_flags))
goto out_unlock;
- get_layout_hdr_locked(lo); /* Matched in pnfs_layoutget_release */
+ get_layout_hdr(lo); /* Matched in pnfs_layoutget_release */
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
lseg = send_layoutget(lo, ctx, &arg);
@@ -1177,7 +1185,7 @@ pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
pnfs_copy_layout_stateid(&data->args.stateid, nfsi->layout);
/* Reference for layoutcommit matched in pnfs_layoutcommit_release */
- get_layout_hdr_locked(NFS_I(inode)->layout);
+ get_layout_hdr(NFS_I(inode)->layout);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
index 96af66f..e631487 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type {
};
struct pnfs_layout_hdr {
- unsigned long refcount;
+ atomic_t plh_refcount;
struct list_head layouts; /* other client layouts */
struct list_head segs; /* layout segments list */
int roc_iomode;/* return on close iomode, 0=none */
--
1.7.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-04 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-04 15:22 [PATCH 00/18] rewrite of CB_LAYOUTRECALL and layoutstate code Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 01/18] NFSv4.1: Callback share session between ops Fred Isaman
2010-11-10 13:37 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 13:41 ` [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: fixups for nfsv4.1 callbacks Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 14:53 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 02/18] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_segment refcounting from kref to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 03/18] pnfs-submit: remove _pnfs_can_return_lseg call from pnfs_clear_lseg_list Fred Isaman
2010-11-10 14:35 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 14:46 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 7:00 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-11 13:52 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 14:39 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 04/18] pnfs-submit: change layout state seqlock to a spinlock Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 15:00 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-11 15:09 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 05/18] pnfs-submit: layoutreturn' rpc_call_op functions need to handle bulk returns Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 15:01 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 06/18] pnfs_submit: nfs4_layoutreturn_release should not reference results Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 15:16 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 07/18] pnfs-submit: reorganize struct cb_layoutrecallargs Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 08/18] pnfs-submit: rename lo->state to lo->plh_flags Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` Fred Isaman [this message]
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 10/18] pnfs-submit: argument to should_free_lseg changed from lseg to range Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 11/18] pnfs-submit: remove unnecessary field lgp->status Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 12/18] pnfs-submit: remove RPC_ASSASSINATED(task) checks Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 13/18] pnfs-submit: rewrite of layout state handling and cb_layoutrecall Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 14/18] pnfs-submit: increase number of outstanding CB_LAYOUTRECALLS we can handle Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 15/18] pnfs-submit: roc add layoutreturn op to close compound Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 16/18] pnfs-submit refactor layoutcommit xdr structures Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 17/18] pnfs-submit refactor pnfs_layoutcommit_setup Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 18/18] pnfs_submit: roc add layoutcommit op to close compound Fred Isaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288884151-11128-10-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com \
--to=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).