linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/18] pnfs-submit: layoutreturn' rpc_call_op functions need to handle bulk returns
Date: Thu,  4 Nov 2010 11:22:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288884151-11128-6-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288884151-11128-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>

nfs4_proc_layoutreturn and its descendants were assuming that
inode and lo were always available, but that is not true in the
case of a bulk return.

Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
---
 fs/nfs/callback_proc.c  |    1 +
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c       |   37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 fs/nfs/pnfs.c           |    4 +++-
 include/linux/nfs_xdr.h |    1 +
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
index 3e022a8..53a85648 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
@@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ static int pnfs_recall_layout(void *data)
 	lrp->args.reclaim = 0;
 	lrp->args.layout_type = rl.cbl_layout_type;
 	lrp->args.return_type = rl.cbl_recall_type;
+	lrp->clp = clp;
 	lrp->args.range = rl.cbl_seg;
 	lrp->args.inode = inode;
 	nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(lrp, true);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 73bd44e..8d3965c 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5557,23 +5557,23 @@ static void
 nfs4_layoutreturn_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 {
 	struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp = calldata;
-	struct inode *ino = lrp->args.inode;
-	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(ino);
-	struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(ino);
 
 	dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
-	if ((lrp->args.return_type == RETURN_FILE) &&
-	    pnfs_return_layout_barrier(nfsi, &lrp->args.range)) {
-		dprintk("%s: waiting on barrier\n", __func__);
-		rpc_sleep_on(&nfsi->lo_rpcwaitq, task, NULL);
-		return;
+	if (lrp->args.return_type == RETURN_FILE) {
+		struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode);
+
+		if (pnfs_return_layout_barrier(nfsi, &lrp->args.range)) {
+			dprintk("%s: waiting on barrier\n", __func__);
+			rpc_sleep_on(&nfsi->lo_rpcwaitq, task, NULL);
+			return;
+		}
 	}
 	if (lrp->stateid) {
 		/* Forget the layout, without sending the return */
 		rpc_exit(task, 0);
 		return;
 	}
-	if (nfs4_setup_sequence(server, NULL, &lrp->args.seq_args,
+	if (nfs41_setup_sequence(lrp->clp->cl_session, &lrp->args.seq_args,
 				&lrp->res.seq_res, 0, task))
 		return;
 	rpc_call_start(task);
@@ -5582,8 +5582,7 @@ nfs4_layoutreturn_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 {
 	struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp = calldata;
-	struct inode *ino = lrp->args.inode;
-	struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(ino);
+	struct nfs_server *server;
 
 	dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
 
@@ -5593,8 +5592,12 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 	if (RPC_ASSASSINATED(task))
 		return;
 
-	if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL, NULL) == -EAGAIN)
-		nfs_restart_rpc(task, server->nfs_client);
+	if (lrp->args.return_type == RETURN_FILE)
+		server = NFS_SERVER(lrp->args.inode);
+	else
+		server = NULL;
+	if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL, lrp->clp) == -EAGAIN)
+		nfs_restart_rpc(task, lrp->clp);
 
 	dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
 }
@@ -5602,10 +5605,8 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 static void nfs4_layoutreturn_release(void *calldata)
 {
 	struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp = calldata;
-	struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
 
-	dprintk("--> %s return_type %d lo %p\n", __func__,
-		lrp->args.return_type, lo);
+	dprintk("--> %s return_type %d\n", __func__, lrp->args.return_type);
 
 	pnfs_layoutreturn_release(lrp);
 	kfree(calldata);
@@ -5620,8 +5621,6 @@ static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs4_layoutreturn_call_ops = {
 
 int nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp, bool issync)
 {
-	struct inode *ino = lrp->args.inode;
-	struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(ino);
 	struct rpc_task *task;
 	struct rpc_message msg = {
 		.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_LAYOUTRETURN],
@@ -5629,7 +5628,7 @@ int nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp, bool issync)
 		.rpc_resp = &lrp->res,
 	};
 	struct rpc_task_setup task_setup_data = {
-		.rpc_client = server->client,
+		.rpc_client = lrp->clp->cl_rpcclient,
 		.rpc_message = &msg,
 		.callback_ops = &nfs4_layoutreturn_call_ops,
 		.callback_data = lrp,
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 01ecb95..34f6914 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -590,10 +590,11 @@ pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *nfsi,
 void
 pnfs_layoutreturn_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp)
 {
-	struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
+	struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
 
 	if (lrp->args.return_type != RETURN_FILE)
 		return;
+	lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
 	spin_lock(&lrp->args.inode->i_lock);
 	if (!lrp->res.valid)
 		;	/* forgetful model internal release */
@@ -630,6 +631,7 @@ return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
 	lrp->args.range = *range;
 	lrp->args.inode = ino;
 	lrp->stateid = stateid;
+	lrp->clp = server->nfs_client;
 
 	status = nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(lrp, wait);
 out:
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
index 1ff6cb0..0ee7cce 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct nfs4_layoutreturn {
 	struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res res;
 	struct rpc_cred *cred;
 	const nfs4_stateid *stateid;
+	struct nfs_client *clp;
 	int rpc_status;
 };
 
-- 
1.7.2.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-04 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-04 15:22 [PATCH 00/18] rewrite of CB_LAYOUTRECALL and layoutstate code Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 01/18] NFSv4.1: Callback share session between ops Fred Isaman
2010-11-10 13:37   ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 13:41     ` [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: fixups for nfsv4.1 callbacks Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 14:53       ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 02/18] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_segment refcounting from kref to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 03/18] pnfs-submit: remove _pnfs_can_return_lseg call from pnfs_clear_lseg_list Fred Isaman
2010-11-10 14:35   ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-10 14:46     ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-11  7:00       ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-11 13:52         ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 14:39           ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 04/18] pnfs-submit: change layout state seqlock to a spinlock Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 15:00   ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-11 15:09     ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` Fred Isaman [this message]
2010-11-11 15:01   ` [PATCH 05/18] pnfs-submit: layoutreturn' rpc_call_op functions need to handle bulk returns Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 06/18] pnfs_submit: nfs4_layoutreturn_release should not reference results Fred Isaman
2010-11-11 15:16   ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 07/18] pnfs-submit: reorganize struct cb_layoutrecallargs Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 08/18] pnfs-submit: rename lo->state to lo->plh_flags Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 09/18] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_hdr refcount to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 10/18] pnfs-submit: argument to should_free_lseg changed from lseg to range Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 11/18] pnfs-submit: remove unnecessary field lgp->status Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 12/18] pnfs-submit: remove RPC_ASSASSINATED(task) checks Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 13/18] pnfs-submit: rewrite of layout state handling and cb_layoutrecall Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 14/18] pnfs-submit: increase number of outstanding CB_LAYOUTRECALLS we can handle Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 15/18] pnfs-submit: roc add layoutreturn op to close compound Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 16/18] pnfs-submit refactor layoutcommit xdr structures Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 17/18] pnfs-submit refactor pnfs_layoutcommit_setup Fred Isaman
2010-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 18/18] pnfs_submit: roc add layoutcommit op to close compound Fred Isaman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1288884151-11128-6-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com \
    --to=iisaman@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).