linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/22] pnfs_submit: nfs4_layoutreturn_release should not reference results
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:48:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289551724-18575-13-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289551724-18575-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>

Since the release function may be called without sending any RPC,
it must not refer to any of the result fields.  This is
better accomplished in the rpc_done function.

In the process, this basically reimplements the commit
"pnfs: do not change layout stateid when dropping layouts."

Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c       |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c        |    1 -
 fs/nfs/pnfs.c           |   26 ++------------------------
 fs/nfs/pnfs.h           |    3 ++-
 include/linux/nfs_xdr.h |    1 -
 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 5ccde2a..fe79872 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5578,9 +5578,20 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 		server = NFS_SERVER(lrp->args.inode);
 	else
 		server = NULL;
-	if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL, lrp->clp) == -EAGAIN)
+	if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL, lrp->clp) == -EAGAIN) {
 		nfs_restart_rpc(task, lrp->clp);
+		return;
+	}
+	if ((task->tk_status == 0) && (lrp->args.return_type == RETURN_FILE)) {
+		struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
 
+		spin_lock(&lo->inode->i_lock);
+		if (lrp->res.lrs_present)
+			pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &lrp->res.stateid);
+		else
+			pnfs_invalidate_layout_stateid(lo);
+		spin_unlock(&lo->inode->i_lock);
+	}
 	dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
 }
 
@@ -5589,8 +5600,17 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_release(void *calldata)
 	struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp = calldata;
 
 	dprintk("--> %s return_type %d\n", __func__, lrp->args.return_type);
+	if (lrp->args.return_type == RETURN_FILE) {
+		struct inode *ino = lrp->args.inode;
+		struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(ino)->layout;
 
-	pnfs_layoutreturn_release(lrp);
+		spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
+		lo->plh_block_lgets--;
+		if (!pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo))
+			rpc_wake_up(&NFS_I(ino)->lo_rpcwaitq_stateid);
+		spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
+		put_layout_hdr(lrp->args.inode);
+	}
 	kfree(calldata);
 	dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
 }
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
index 550e457..328cca5 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
@@ -5287,7 +5287,6 @@ static int decode_layoutreturn(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
 	p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, 4);
 	if (unlikely(!p))
 		goto out_overflow;
-	res->valid = true;
 	res->lrs_present = be32_to_cpup(p);
 	if (res->lrs_present)
 		status = decode_stateid(xdr, &res->stateid);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 1147eb3..353c674 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ pnfs_destroy_all_layouts(struct nfs_client *clp)
  *
  * lo->stateid could be the open stateid, in which case we just use what given.
  */
-static void
+void
 pnfs_set_layout_stateid(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
 			const nfs4_stateid *new)
 {
@@ -580,28 +580,6 @@ pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *nfsi,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-void
-pnfs_layoutreturn_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp)
-{
-	struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
-
-	if (lrp->args.return_type != RETURN_FILE)
-		return;
-	lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
-	spin_lock(&lrp->args.inode->i_lock);
-	lo->plh_block_lgets--;
-	if (!pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(lo))
-		rpc_wake_up(&NFS_I(lo->inode)->lo_rpcwaitq_stateid);
-	if (!lrp->res.valid)
-		;	/* forgetful model internal release */
-	else if (!lrp->res.lrs_present)
-		pnfs_invalidate_layout_stateid(lo);
-	else 
-		pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &lrp->res.stateid);
-	put_layout_hdr_locked(lo); /* Matched in _pnfs_return_layout */
-	spin_unlock(&lrp->args.inode->i_lock);
-}
-
 static int
 return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
 	      enum pnfs_layoutreturn_type type, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
@@ -672,7 +650,7 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, tmp, &lo->segs, fi_list)
 			if (should_free_lseg(&lseg->range, &arg))
 				mark_lseg_invalid(lseg, &tmp_list);
-		/* Reference matched in pnfs_layoutreturn_release */
+		/* Reference matched in nfs4_layoutreturn_release */
 		get_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
 		spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
 		pnfs_free_lseg_list(&tmp_list);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
index a9a3bea..4f2c541 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
@@ -203,10 +203,11 @@ void pnfs_pageio_init_read(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *, struct inode *,
 void pnfs_pageio_init_write(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *, struct inode *);
 bool pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo);
 int pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp);
-void pnfs_layoutreturn_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lpr);
 void pnfs_destroy_layout(struct nfs_inode *);
 void pnfs_destroy_all_layouts(struct nfs_client *);
 void put_layout_hdr(struct inode *inode);
+void pnfs_set_layout_stateid(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
+			     const nfs4_stateid *new);
 void pnfs_get_layout_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
 			     struct nfs4_state *open_state);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
index 23a4519..f472405 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
@@ -269,7 +269,6 @@ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args {
 
 struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res {
 	struct nfs4_sequence_res seq_res;
-	bool valid;	/* internal, true if received reply */
 	u32 lrs_present;
 	nfs4_stateid stateid;
 };
-- 
1.7.2.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-12  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-12  8:48 [PATCH 00/22] rewrite of CB_LAYOUTRECALL and layoutstate code, try 2 Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 01/22] pnfs-submit: remove RPC_ASSASSINATED(task) checks Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 02/22] pnfs-submit: remove unnecessary field lgp->status Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 03/22] pnfs-submit: layoutreturn's rpc_call_op functions need to handle bulk returns Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 04/22] pnfs-submit: argument to should_free_lseg changed from lseg to range Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 05/22] pnfs-submit: change layout state seqlock to a spinlock Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 06/22] NFSv4.1: Callback share session between ops Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 07/22] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: fixups for nfsv4.1 callbacks Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 08/22] SQUASHME: allow cb_sequence changes to compile without v4.1 Fred Isaman
2010-11-14 12:05   ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 15:07     ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 09/22] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_segment refcounting from kref to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 10/22] pnfs-submit: Have LAYOUTGETS wait when lo->plh_block_lgets is set Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 11/22] pnfs-submit: remove _pnfs_can_return_lseg call from pnfs_clear_lseg_list Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` Fred Isaman [this message]
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 13/22] pnfs-submit: reorganize struct cb_layoutrecallargs Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 14/22] pnfs-submit: rename lo->state to lo->plh_flags Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 15/22] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_hdr refcount to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 16/22] pnfs-submit: rewrite of layout state handling and cb_layoutrecall Fred Isaman
2010-11-13  9:11   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-14 11:44     ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-14 11:50       ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 14:28         ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-14 15:43   ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 14:51     ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-15 16:17       ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 17:53         ` [nfsv4] " Fred Isaman
2010-11-15 19:19           ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-15 20:40             ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-16  9:54               ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-16 11:12                 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-17 17:53           ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 17/22] pnfs-submit: increase number of outstanding CB_LAYOUTRECALLS we can handle Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 18/22] pnfs-submit: roc add layoutreturn op to close compound Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 16:31   ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-12 16:56     ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-14 10:54       ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-14 14:21       ` [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: encode layoutreturn on close before close Benny Halevy
2010-11-14 18:12         ` [PATCH 2/2] pnfs-submit: handle NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED for LAYOUTRETURN Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 12:54           ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 15:02         ` [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: encode layoutreturn on close before close Fred Isaman
2010-11-15 15:34           ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 19/22] pnfs-submit refactor layoutcommit xdr structures Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 20/22] pnfs-submit refactor pnfs_layoutcommit_setup Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 21/22] pnfs_submit: roc add layoutcommit op to close compound Fred Isaman
2010-11-12  8:48 ` [PATCH 22/22] SQUASHME: make roc patches compile without v4.1 Fred Isaman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1289551724-18575-13-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com \
    --to=iisaman@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).