From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/22] pnfs-submit: layoutreturn's rpc_call_op functions need to handle bulk returns
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:48:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289551724-18575-4-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289551724-18575-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>
nfs4_proc_layoutreturn and its descendants were assuming that
inode and lo were always available, but that is not true in the
case of a bulk return.
Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 1 +
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 4 +++-
include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
index 6b560ce..4dabc62 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
@@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static int pnfs_recall_layout(void *data)
lrp->args.reclaim = 0;
lrp->args.layout_type = rl.cbl_layout_type;
lrp->args.return_type = rl.cbl_recall_type;
+ lrp->clp = clp;
lrp->args.range = rl.cbl_seg;
lrp->args.inode = inode;
nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(lrp, true);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index d01068c..8dbd711 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5553,23 +5553,23 @@ static void
nfs4_layoutreturn_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
{
struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp = calldata;
- struct inode *ino = lrp->args.inode;
- struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(ino);
- struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(ino);
dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
- if ((lrp->args.return_type == RETURN_FILE) &&
- pnfs_return_layout_barrier(nfsi, &lrp->args.range)) {
- dprintk("%s: waiting on barrier\n", __func__);
- rpc_sleep_on(&nfsi->lo_rpcwaitq, task, NULL);
- return;
+ if (lrp->args.return_type == RETURN_FILE) {
+ struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode);
+
+ if (pnfs_return_layout_barrier(nfsi, &lrp->args.range)) {
+ dprintk("%s: waiting on barrier\n", __func__);
+ rpc_sleep_on(&nfsi->lo_rpcwaitq, task, NULL);
+ return;
+ }
}
if (lrp->stateid) {
/* Forget the layout, without sending the return */
rpc_exit(task, 0);
return;
}
- if (nfs4_setup_sequence(server, NULL, &lrp->args.seq_args,
+ if (nfs41_setup_sequence(lrp->clp->cl_session, &lrp->args.seq_args,
&lrp->res.seq_res, 0, task))
return;
rpc_call_start(task);
@@ -5578,16 +5578,19 @@ nfs4_layoutreturn_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
{
struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp = calldata;
- struct inode *ino = lrp->args.inode;
- struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(ino);
+ struct nfs_server *server;
dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
if (!nfs4_sequence_done(task, &lrp->res.seq_res))
return;
- if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL, NULL) == -EAGAIN)
- nfs_restart_rpc(task, server->nfs_client);
+ if (lrp->args.return_type == RETURN_FILE)
+ server = NFS_SERVER(lrp->args.inode);
+ else
+ server = NULL;
+ if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL, lrp->clp) == -EAGAIN)
+ nfs_restart_rpc(task, lrp->clp);
dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
}
@@ -5595,10 +5598,8 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
static void nfs4_layoutreturn_release(void *calldata)
{
struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp = calldata;
- struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
- dprintk("--> %s return_type %d lo %p\n", __func__,
- lrp->args.return_type, lo);
+ dprintk("--> %s return_type %d\n", __func__, lrp->args.return_type);
pnfs_layoutreturn_release(lrp);
kfree(calldata);
@@ -5613,8 +5614,6 @@ static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs4_layoutreturn_call_ops = {
int nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp, bool issync)
{
- struct inode *ino = lrp->args.inode;
- struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(ino);
struct rpc_task *task;
struct rpc_message msg = {
.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_LAYOUTRETURN],
@@ -5622,7 +5621,7 @@ int nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp, bool issync)
.rpc_resp = &lrp->res,
};
struct rpc_task_setup task_setup_data = {
- .rpc_client = server->client,
+ .rpc_client = lrp->clp->cl_rpcclient,
.rpc_message = &msg,
.callback_ops = &nfs4_layoutreturn_call_ops,
.callback_data = lrp,
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 72d7ed3..149f95e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -582,11 +582,12 @@ pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *nfsi,
void
pnfs_layoutreturn_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp)
{
- struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
+ struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
if (lrp->args.return_type != RETURN_FILE)
return;
+ lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
spin_lock(&lrp->args.inode->i_lock);
pnfs_clear_lseg_list(lo, &tmp_list, &lrp->args.range);
if (!lrp->res.valid)
@@ -625,6 +626,7 @@ return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
lrp->args.range = *range;
lrp->args.inode = ino;
lrp->stateid = stateid;
+ lrp->clp = server->nfs_client;
status = nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(lrp, wait);
out:
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
index 53a4d2f..23a4519 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ struct nfs4_layoutreturn {
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res res;
struct rpc_cred *cred;
const nfs4_stateid *stateid;
+ struct nfs_client *clp;
int rpc_status;
};
--
1.7.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-12 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-12 8:48 [PATCH 00/22] rewrite of CB_LAYOUTRECALL and layoutstate code, try 2 Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 01/22] pnfs-submit: remove RPC_ASSASSINATED(task) checks Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 02/22] pnfs-submit: remove unnecessary field lgp->status Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` Fred Isaman [this message]
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 04/22] pnfs-submit: argument to should_free_lseg changed from lseg to range Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 05/22] pnfs-submit: change layout state seqlock to a spinlock Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 06/22] NFSv4.1: Callback share session between ops Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 07/22] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: fixups for nfsv4.1 callbacks Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 08/22] SQUASHME: allow cb_sequence changes to compile without v4.1 Fred Isaman
2010-11-14 12:05 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 15:07 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 09/22] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_segment refcounting from kref to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 10/22] pnfs-submit: Have LAYOUTGETS wait when lo->plh_block_lgets is set Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 11/22] pnfs-submit: remove _pnfs_can_return_lseg call from pnfs_clear_lseg_list Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 12/22] pnfs_submit: nfs4_layoutreturn_release should not reference results Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 13/22] pnfs-submit: reorganize struct cb_layoutrecallargs Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 14/22] pnfs-submit: rename lo->state to lo->plh_flags Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 15/22] pnfs-submit: change pnfs_layout_hdr refcount to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 16/22] pnfs-submit: rewrite of layout state handling and cb_layoutrecall Fred Isaman
2010-11-13 9:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-14 11:44 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-14 11:50 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 14:28 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-14 15:43 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 14:51 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-15 16:17 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 17:53 ` [nfsv4] " Fred Isaman
2010-11-15 19:19 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-15 20:40 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-16 9:54 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-16 11:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-17 17:53 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 17/22] pnfs-submit: increase number of outstanding CB_LAYOUTRECALLS we can handle Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 18/22] pnfs-submit: roc add layoutreturn op to close compound Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 16:31 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-12 16:56 ` Fred Isaman
2010-11-14 10:54 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-14 14:21 ` [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: encode layoutreturn on close before close Benny Halevy
2010-11-14 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] pnfs-submit: handle NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED for LAYOUTRETURN Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 12:54 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Benny Halevy
2010-11-15 15:02 ` [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-submit: encode layoutreturn on close before close Fred Isaman
2010-11-15 15:34 ` Benny Halevy
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 19/22] pnfs-submit refactor layoutcommit xdr structures Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 20/22] pnfs-submit refactor pnfs_layoutcommit_setup Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 21/22] pnfs_submit: roc add layoutcommit op to close compound Fred Isaman
2010-11-12 8:48 ` [PATCH 22/22] SQUASHME: make roc patches compile without v4.1 Fred Isaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289551724-18575-4-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com \
--to=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).