From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] pnfs: avoid incorrect use of layout stateid
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:27:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296487633-21057-2-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296487633-21057-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>
The code could violate the following from RFC5661, section 12.5.3:
"Once a client has no more layouts on a file, the layout stateid is no
longer valid and MUST NOT be used."
This can occur when a layout already has a lseg, starts another
non-everlapping LAYOUTGET, and a CB_LAYOUTRECALL for the existing lseg
is processed before we hit pnfs_layout_process().
Solve by setting, each time the client has no more lsegs for a file, a
flag which blocks further use of the layout and triggers its removal.
This also fixes a second bug which occurs in the same instance as
above. If we actually use pnfs_layout_process, we add the new lseg to
the layout, but the layout has been removed from the nfs_client list
by the intervening CB_LAYOUTRECALL and will not be added back. Thus
the newly acquired lseg will not be properly returned in the event of
a subsequent CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 1b1bc1a..dcd5d54 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ put_lseg_locked(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
list_del_init(&lseg->pls_layout->plh_layouts);
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
clear_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lseg->pls_layout->plh_flags);
+ set_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_DESTROYED, &lseg->pls_layout->plh_flags);
+ /* Matched by initial refcount set in alloc_init_layout_hdr */
+ put_layout_hdr_locked(lseg->pls_layout);
}
rpc_wake_up(&NFS_SERVER(ino)->roc_rpcwaitq);
list_add(&lseg->pls_list, tmp_list);
@@ -299,6 +302,11 @@ mark_matching_lsegs_invalid(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
dprintk("%s:Begin lo %p\n", __func__, lo);
+ if (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs)) {
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_DESTROYED, &lo->plh_flags))
+ put_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
+ return 0;
+ }
list_for_each_entry_safe(lseg, next, &lo->plh_segs, pls_list)
if (should_free_lseg(lseg->pls_range.iomode, iomode)) {
dprintk("%s: freeing lseg %p iomode %d "
@@ -332,10 +340,7 @@ pnfs_destroy_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
lo = nfsi->layout;
if (lo) {
- set_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_DESTROYED, &nfsi->layout->plh_flags);
mark_matching_lsegs_invalid(lo, &tmp_list, IOMODE_ANY);
- /* Matched by refcount set to 1 in alloc_init_layout_hdr */
- put_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
}
spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
pnfs_free_lseg_list(&tmp_list);
@@ -403,6 +408,7 @@ pnfs_layoutgets_blocked(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, nfs4_stateid *stateid,
(int)(lo->plh_barrier - be32_to_cpu(stateid->stateid.seqid)) >= 0)
return true;
return lo->plh_block_lgets ||
+ test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_DESTROYED, &lo->plh_flags) ||
test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lo->plh_flags) ||
(list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) &&
(atomic_read(&lo->plh_outstanding) > lget));
--
1.7.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-31 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 15:27 [PATCH 0/3]: pnfs: fix pnfs lock inversion Fred Isaman
2011-01-31 15:27 ` Fred Isaman [this message]
2011-02-01 15:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] pnfs: avoid incorrect use of layout stateid Benny Halevy
2011-02-01 16:31 ` Fred Isaman
2011-02-02 4:19 ` Benny Halevy
2011-02-02 5:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-02-03 8:15 ` Benny Halevy
2011-02-02 15:45 ` Fred Isaman
2011-02-03 8:17 ` Benny Halevy
2011-01-31 15:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] pnfs: do not need to clear NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL flag Fred Isaman
2011-01-31 15:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] pnfs: fix pnfs lock inversion of i_lock and cl_lock Fred Isaman
2011-02-01 15:41 ` Benny Halevy
2011-02-01 15:54 ` Fred Isaman
2011-02-01 16:03 ` Benny Halevy
2011-02-03 8:58 ` Benny Halevy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-03 18:28 [PATCH 0/3] pnfs: fix pnfs lock inversion, try 2 Fred Isaman
2011-02-03 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] pnfs: avoid incorrect use of layout stateid Fred Isaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296487633-21057-2-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com \
--to=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).