linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Use of READDIRPLUS on large directories
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:20:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300285203.16266.46.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D80C5C6.2060003@netapp.com>

On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 10:14 -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> I guess I misunderstood what to publish test results for?  I know I included numbers on one of the patches (commit 82f2e5472e2304e531c2fa85e457f4a71070044e, copied below)...  I'll find the numbers you're asking about and post them.
> 
> -Bryan
> 
> commit 82f2e5472e2304e531c2fa85e457f4a71070044e
> Author: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
> Date:   Thu Oct 21 16:33:18 2010 -0400
> 
>     NFS: Readdir plus in v4
>     
>     By requsting more attributes during a readdir, we can mimic the readdir plus
>     operation that was in NFSv3.
>     
>     To test, I ran the command `ls -lU --color=none` on directories with various
>     numbers of files.  Without readdir plus, I see this:
>     
>     n files |    100    |   1,000   |  10,000   |  100,000  | 1,000,000
>     --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+----------
>     real    | 0m00.153s | 0m00.589s | 0m05.601s | 0m56.691s | 9m59.128s
>     user    | 0m00.007s | 0m00.007s | 0m00.077s | 0m00.703s | 0m06.800s
>     sys     | 0m00.010s | 0m00.070s | 0m00.633s | 0m06.423s | 1m10.005s
>     access  | 3         | 1         | 1         | 4         | 31
>     getattr | 2         | 1         | 1         | 1         | 1
>     lookup  | 104       | 1,003     | 10,003    | 100,003   | 1,000,003
>     readdir | 2         | 16        | 158       | 1,575     | 15,749
>     total   | 111       | 1,021     | 10,163    | 101,583   | 1,015,784
>     
>     With readdir plus enabled, I see this:
>     
>     n files |    100    |   1,000   |  10,000   |  100,000  | 1,000,000
>     --------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+----------
>     real    | 0m00.115s | 0m00.206s | 0m01.079s | 0m12.521s | 2m07.528s
>     user    | 0m00.003s | 0m00.003s | 0m00.040s | 0m00.290s | 0m03.296s
>     sys     | 0m00.007s | 0m00.020s | 0m00.120s | 0m01.357s | 0m17.556s
>     access  | 3         | 1         | 1         | 1         | 7
>     getattr | 2         | 1         | 1         | 1         | 1
>     lookup  | 4         | 3         | 3         | 3         | 3
>     readdir | 6         | 62        | 630       | 6,300     | 62,993
>     total   | 15        | 67        | 635       | 6,305     | 63,004
>     
>     Readdir plus disabled has about a 16x increase in the number of rpc calls an
>     is 4 - 5 times slower on large directories.

Right. Those are the numbers that convinced me...



-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-16 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-16  4:55 Use of READDIRPLUS on large directories NeilBrown
2011-03-16 12:30 ` peter.staubach
2011-03-16 13:50   ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-16 21:40   ` NeilBrown
2011-03-17  0:55     ` NeilBrown
2011-03-17 17:44       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-18  4:27         ` NeilBrown
2011-03-16 13:43 ` Chuck Lever
2011-03-16 14:14   ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-03-16 14:20     ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2011-03-16 21:30       ` NeilBrown
2011-03-16 21:42         ` Trond Myklebust
2011-03-16 22:40           ` NeilBrown
2011-03-17 17:18             ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-04-04 20:14               ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-04-05 12:20                 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-07 14:28                   ` Bryan Schumaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1300285203.16266.46.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bjschuma@netapp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).