From: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
To: andros@netapp.com, trond@netapp.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Don't mark_inode_dirty_sync() while holding lock
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:17:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302643028-76672-1-git-send-email-dros@netapp.com> (raw)
mark_inode_dirty_sync() grabs the same inode lock!
race conditions between holding the lock in pnfs_set_layoutcommit() and in
mark_inode_dirty_sync() can result in a second call to pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(), but
this will be a noop as NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT won't be set in the second call
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index d9ab972..d71997e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1004,6 +1004,7 @@ pnfs_set_layoutcommit(struct nfs_write_data *wdata)
{
struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(wdata->inode);
loff_t end_pos = wdata->args.offset + wdata->res.count;
+ int mark_as_dirty = false;
spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
if (!test_and_set_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags)) {
@@ -1011,13 +1012,18 @@ pnfs_set_layoutcommit(struct nfs_write_data *wdata)
get_lseg(wdata->lseg);
wdata->lseg->pls_lc_cred =
get_rpccred(wdata->args.context->state->owner->so_cred);
- mark_inode_dirty_sync(wdata->inode);
+ mark_as_dirty = true;
dprintk("%s: Set layoutcommit for inode %lu ",
__func__, wdata->inode->i_ino);
}
if (end_pos > wdata->lseg->pls_end_pos)
wdata->lseg->pls_end_pos = end_pos;
spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
+
+ /* if pnfs_layoutcommit_inode() runs between inode locks, the next one
+ * will be a noop because NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT will not be set */
+ if (mark_as_dirty)
+ mark_inode_dirty_sync(wdata->inode);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_set_layoutcommit);
--
1.7.4.2
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 21:17 Weston Andros Adamson [this message]
2011-04-12 22:23 ` [PATCH] Don't mark_inode_dirty_sync() while holding lock Trond Myklebust
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-13 14:53 Weston Andros Adamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302643028-76672-1-git-send-email-dros@netapp.com \
--to=dros@netapp.com \
--cc=andros@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).