linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Cc: andros@netapp.com, trond@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't mark_inode_dirty_sync() while holding lock
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:23:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302647009.25410.10.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302643028-76672-1-git-send-email-dros@netapp.com>

On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 17:17 -0400, Weston Andros Adamson wrote:
> mark_inode_dirty_sync() grabs the same inode lock!
> 
> race conditions between holding the lock in pnfs_set_layoutcommit() and in
> mark_inode_dirty_sync() can result in a second call to pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(), but
> this will be a noop as NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT won't be set in the second call


I'm missing a "Signed-off-by:" here.

> ---
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c |    8 +++++++-
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index d9ab972..d71997e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -1004,6 +1004,7 @@ pnfs_set_layoutcommit(struct nfs_write_data *wdata)
>  {
>  	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(wdata->inode);
>  	loff_t end_pos = wdata->args.offset + wdata->res.count;
> +	int mark_as_dirty = false;

Strictly speaking, an 'int' does not take values in the set 'true' and
'false'.
 
>  	spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
>  	if (!test_and_set_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags)) {
> @@ -1011,13 +1012,18 @@ pnfs_set_layoutcommit(struct nfs_write_data *wdata)
>  		get_lseg(wdata->lseg);
>  		wdata->lseg->pls_lc_cred =
>  			get_rpccred(wdata->args.context->state->owner->so_cred);
> -		mark_inode_dirty_sync(wdata->inode);
> +		mark_as_dirty = true;
>  		dprintk("%s: Set layoutcommit for inode %lu ",
>  			__func__, wdata->inode->i_ino);
>  	}
>  	if (end_pos > wdata->lseg->pls_end_pos)
>  		wdata->lseg->pls_end_pos = end_pos;
>  	spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> +
> +	/* if pnfs_layoutcommit_inode() runs between inode locks, the next one
> +	 * will be a noop because NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT will not be set */
> +	if (mark_as_dirty)
> +		mark_inode_dirty_sync(wdata->inode);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_set_layoutcommit);

Otherwise this looks fine. Please correct and resend.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-12 21:17 [PATCH] Don't mark_inode_dirty_sync() while holding lock Weston Andros Adamson
2011-04-12 22:23 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-13 14:53 Weston Andros Adamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302647009.25410.10.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=andros@netapp.com \
    --cc=dros@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond@netapp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).