From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, pbadari@us.ibm.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH] BZ#694309: nfs: use unstable writes for groups of small DIO writes
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:43:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302785008-30477-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
Currently, the client uses FILE_SYNC whenever it's writing less than or
equal data to the wsize with O_DIRECT. This is a problem though if we
have a bunch of small iovec's batched up in a single writev call. The
client will iterate over them and do a single FILE_SYNC WRITE for each.
Instead, change the code to do unstable writes when we'll need to do
multiple WRITE RPC's in order to satisfy the request. While we're at
it, optimize away the allocation of commit_data when we aren't going
to use it anyway.
I tested this with a program that allocates 256 page-sized and aligned
chunks of data into an array of iovecs, opens a file with O_DIRECT, and
then passes that into a writev call 128 times. Without this patch, it
took 5m16s to run on my (admittedly crappy) test rig. With this patch,
it finished in 7.5s.
Trond, would it be reasonable to take this patch as a stopgap measure
until your overhaul of the O_DIRECT code is finished?
Reported-by: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfs/direct.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index 8eea253..9fc3430 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -871,9 +871,18 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
dreq = nfs_direct_req_alloc();
if (!dreq)
goto out;
- nfs_alloc_commit_data(dreq);
- if (dreq->commit_data == NULL || count <= wsize)
+ if (count > wsize || nr_segs > 1)
+ nfs_alloc_commit_data(dreq);
+ else
+ dreq->commit_data = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * If we couldn't allocate commit data, or we'll just be doing a
+ * single write, then make this a NFS_FILE_SYNC write and do away
+ * with the commit.
+ */
+ if (dreq->commit_data == NULL)
sync = NFS_FILE_SYNC;
dreq->inode = inode;
--
1.7.1
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-14 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 12:43 Jeff Layton [this message]
2011-04-15 4:13 ` [PATCH] BZ#694309: nfs: use unstable writes for groups of small DIO writes Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302785008-30477-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).