From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] nfs4.1: fix several problems with _pnfs_return_layout
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:54:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308005693-8330-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com> (raw)
_pnfs_return_layout had the following problems:
- it did not call pnfs_free_lseg_list on all paths
- it unintentionally did a forgetful return when there was no outstanding io
- it raced with concurrent LAYOUTGETS
Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 8 ++++----
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index bc78597..2b2f51b 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5757,6 +5757,7 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
{
struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp = calldata;
struct nfs_server *server;
+ struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
@@ -5768,16 +5769,15 @@ static void nfs4_layoutreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
nfs_restart_rpc(task, lrp->clp);
return;
}
+ spin_lock(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
if (task->tk_status == 0) {
- struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo = NFS_I(lrp->args.inode)->layout;
-
if (lrp->res.lrs_present) {
- spin_lock(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &lrp->res.stateid, true);
- spin_unlock(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
} else
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&lo->plh_segs));
}
+ lo->plh_block_lgets--;
+ spin_unlock(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
dprintk("<-- %s\n", __func__);
}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 8ff8c1b..1abb300 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -640,12 +640,14 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino)
spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
lo = nfsi->layout;
- if (!lo || !mark_matching_lsegs_invalid(lo, &tmp_list, NULL)) {
+ if (!lo) {
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
- dprintk("%s: no layout segments to return\n", __func__);
- goto out;
+ dprintk("%s: no layout to return\n", __func__);
+ return status;
}
stateid = nfsi->layout->plh_stateid;
+ mark_matching_lsegs_invalid(lo, &tmp_list, NULL);
+ lo->plh_block_lgets++;
/* Reference matched in nfs4_layoutreturn_release */
get_layout_hdr(lo);
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
--
1.7.2.1
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-13 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-13 22:54 Fred Isaman [this message]
2011-06-14 14:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] nfs4.1: fix several problems with _pnfs_return_layout Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1308005693-8330-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com \
--to=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).