linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
	Brent Welch <welch@panasas.com>,
	NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	open-osd <osd-dev@open-osd.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/19] pnfs-obj: Remove redundant EOF from objlayout_io_state
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:34:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317724499-27702-1-git-send-email-bharrosh@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8ADEDA.4050709@panasas.com>

The EOF calculation was done on .read_pagelist(), cached
in objlayout_io_state->eof, and set in objlayout_read_done()
into nfs_read_data->res.eof.

So set it directly into nfs_read_data->res.eof and avoid
the extra member.

This is a slight behaviour change because before eof was
*not* set on an error update at objlayout_read_done(). But
is that a problem? Is Generic layer so sensitive that it
will miss the error IO if eof was set? From my testing
I did not see such a problem.

Benny please review.

Which brings me to a more abstract problem. Why does the
LAYOUT driver needs to do this eof calculation? .i.e we
are inspecting generic i_size_read() and if spanned by
offset + count which is received from generic layer we set
eof. It looks like all this can/should be done in generic
layer and not at LD. Where does NFS and files-LD do it?
It looks like it can be promoted.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
 fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c |   16 +++++++---------
 fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h |    1 -
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c
index 1d06f8e..1300736 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c
@@ -287,17 +287,14 @@ static void _rpc_read_complete(struct work_struct *work)
 void
 objlayout_read_done(struct objlayout_io_state *state, ssize_t status, bool sync)
 {
-	int eof = state->eof;
-	struct nfs_read_data *rdata;
+	struct nfs_read_data *rdata = state->rpcdata;
 
 	state->status = status;
-	dprintk("%s: Begin status=%zd eof=%d\n", __func__, status, eof);
-	rdata = state->rpcdata;
+	dprintk("%s: Begin status=%zd eof=%d\n", __func__,
+		status, rdata->res.eof);
 	rdata->task.tk_status = status;
-	if (status >= 0) {
+	if (status >= 0)
 		rdata->res.count = status;
-		rdata->res.eof = eof;
-	}
 	objlayout_iodone(state);
 	/* must not use state after this point */
 
@@ -330,11 +327,14 @@ objlayout_read_pagelist(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
 			status = 0;
 			rdata->res.count = 0;
 			rdata->res.eof = 1;
+			/*FIXME: do we need to call pnfs_ld_read_done() */
 			goto out;
 		}
 		count = eof - offset;
 	}
 
+	rdata->res.eof = (offset + count) >= eof;
+
 	state = objlayout_alloc_io_state(NFS_I(rdata->inode)->layout,
 					 rdata->args.pages, rdata->args.pgbase,
 					 offset, count,
@@ -345,8 +345,6 @@ objlayout_read_pagelist(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	state->eof = state->offset + state->count >= eof;
-
 	status = objio_read_pagelist(state);
  out:
 	dprintk("%s: Return status %Zd\n", __func__, status);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h
index a8244c8..ffb884c 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ struct objlayout_io_state {
 
 	void *rpcdata;
 	int status;             /* res */
-	int eof;                /* res */
 	int committed;          /* res */
 
 	/* Error reporting (layout_return) */
-- 
1.7.2.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-04 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-04 10:24 [PATCHSET 00/19] objlayout: Move to ORE Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:28 ` [PATCH 01/19] exofs: Rename struct ore_components comps => oc Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:28 ` [PATCH 02/19] exofs: Remove unused data_map member from exofs_sb_info Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:29 ` [PATCH 03/19] ore: Make ore_striping_info and ore_calc_stripe_info public Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:29 ` [PATCH 04/19] ore/exofs: Change the type of the devices array (API change) Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 05/19] ore: Only IO one group at a time " Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 06/19] ore: cleanup: Embed an ore_striping_info inside ore_io_state Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:31 ` [PATCH 07/19] ore: Remove check for ios->kern_buff in _prepare_for_striping to later Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:32 ` [PATCH 08/19] exofs: Support for short read/writes Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:32 ` [PATCH 09/19] ore: " Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:33 ` [PATCH 10/19] ore: Support for partial component table Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:34 ` [PATCH 11/19] ore/exofs: Define new ore_verify_layout Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:34 ` [PATCH 12/19] ore/exofs: Change ore_check_io API Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:34 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2011-10-07 16:58   ` [PATCH 13/19] pnfs-obj: Remove redundant EOF from objlayout_io_state Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 10:35 ` [PATCH 14/19] pnfs-obj: Return PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED in case of read/write_pagelist Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-07 17:06   ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 10:35 ` [PATCH 15/19] pnfs-obj: Get rid of objlayout_{alloc,free}_io_state Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-07 17:17   ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 10:36 ` [PATCH 16/19] pnfs-obj: Rename objlayout_io_state => objlayout_io_res Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 12:20   ` Jim Rees
2011-10-04 12:27     ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-04 10:36 ` [PATCH 17/19] pnfs-obj: move to ore 01: ore_layout & ore_components Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-07 17:26   ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 10:36 ` [PATCH 18/19] pnfs-obj: move to ore 02: move to ORE Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-07 17:26   ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 10:37 ` [PATCH 19/19] pnfs-obj: move to ore 03: Remove old raid engine Boaz Harrosh
2011-10-07 17:27   ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 12:04 ` [PATCHSET 00/19] objlayout: Move to ORE Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 12:24   ` Boaz Harrosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1317724499-27702-1-git-send-email-bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
    --cc=welch@panasas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).