From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] nfsd4: share open and lock owner hash tables
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:59:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320793145-29070-2-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111108225751.GD27413@fieldses.org>
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Now that they're used in the same way, it's a little simpler to put open
and lock owners in the same hash table, and I can't see a reason not to.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index eec9900..dcbe7f3 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -133,21 +133,21 @@ unsigned int max_delegations;
* Open owner state (share locks)
*/
-/* hash tables for open owners */
-#define OPEN_OWNER_HASH_BITS 8
-#define OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE (1 << OPEN_OWNER_HASH_BITS)
-#define OPEN_OWNER_HASH_MASK (OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE - 1)
+/* hash tables for lock and open owners */
+#define OWNER_HASH_BITS 8
+#define OWNER_HASH_SIZE (1 << OWNER_HASH_BITS)
+#define OWNER_HASH_MASK (OWNER_HASH_SIZE - 1)
-static unsigned int open_ownerstr_hashval(u32 clientid, struct xdr_netobj *ownername)
+static unsigned int ownerstr_hashval(u32 clientid, struct xdr_netobj *ownername)
{
unsigned int ret;
ret = opaque_hashval(ownername->data, ownername->len);
ret += clientid;
- return ret & OPEN_OWNER_HASH_MASK;
+ return ret & OWNER_HASH_MASK;
}
-static struct list_head open_ownerstr_hashtbl[OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE];
+static struct list_head ownerstr_hashtbl[OWNER_HASH_SIZE];
/* hash table for nfs4_file */
#define FILE_HASH_BITS 8
@@ -2373,7 +2373,7 @@ static inline void *alloc_stateowner(struct kmem_cache *slab, struct xdr_netobj
static void hash_openowner(struct nfs4_openowner *oo, struct nfs4_client *clp, unsigned int strhashval)
{
- list_add(&oo->oo_owner.so_strhash, &open_ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
+ list_add(&oo->oo_owner.so_strhash, &ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
list_add(&oo->oo_perclient, &clp->cl_openowners);
}
@@ -2436,7 +2436,9 @@ find_openstateowner_str(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open)
struct nfs4_stateowner *so;
struct nfs4_openowner *oo;
- list_for_each_entry(so, &open_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ list_for_each_entry(so, &ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ if (!so->so_is_open_owner)
+ continue;
if (same_owner_str(so, &open->op_owner, &open->op_clientid)) {
oo = openowner(so);
renew_client(oo->oo_owner.so_client);
@@ -2580,7 +2582,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open1(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
if (open->op_file == NULL)
return nfserr_jukebox;
- strhashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(clientid->cl_id, &open->op_owner);
+ strhashval = ownerstr_hashval(clientid->cl_id, &open->op_owner);
oo = find_openstateowner_str(strhashval, open);
open->op_openowner = oo;
if (!oo) {
@@ -3718,13 +3720,7 @@ out:
}
-/*
- * Lock owner state (byte-range locks)
- */
#define LOFF_OVERFLOW(start, len) ((u64)(len) > ~(u64)(start))
-#define LOCK_HASH_BITS 8
-#define LOCK_HASH_SIZE (1 << LOCK_HASH_BITS)
-#define LOCK_HASH_MASK (LOCK_HASH_SIZE - 1)
static inline u64
end_offset(u64 start, u64 len)
@@ -3746,8 +3742,6 @@ last_byte_offset(u64 start, u64 len)
return end > start ? end - 1: NFS4_MAX_UINT64;
}
-static struct list_head lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[LOCK_HASH_SIZE];
-
/*
* TODO: Linux file offsets are _signed_ 64-bit quantities, which means that
* we can't properly handle lock requests that go beyond the (2^63 - 1)-th
@@ -3815,11 +3809,13 @@ static struct nfs4_lockowner *
find_lockowner_str(struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid,
struct xdr_netobj *owner)
{
- unsigned int hashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
+ unsigned int hashval = ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
struct nfs4_stateowner *op;
- list_for_each_entry(op, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ list_for_each_entry(op, &ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ if (op->so_is_open_owner)
+ continue;
lo = lockowner(op);
if (same_lockowner_ino(lo, inode, clid, owner))
return lo;
@@ -3829,7 +3825,7 @@ find_lockowner_str(struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid,
static void hash_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, unsigned int strhashval, struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *open_stp)
{
- list_add(&lo->lo_owner.so_strhash, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
+ list_add(&lo->lo_owner.so_strhash, &ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
list_add(&lo->lo_perstateid, &open_stp->st_lockowners);
}
@@ -3838,7 +3834,7 @@ static void hash_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, unsigned int strhashval, s
* Called in nfsd4_lock - therefore, OPEN and OPEN_CONFIRM (if needed) has
* occurred.
*
- * strhashval = open_ownerstr_hashval
+ * strhashval = ownerstr_hashval
*/
static struct nfs4_lockowner *
@@ -3913,7 +3909,7 @@ __be32 lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, struct n
struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
return nfs_ok;
}
- strhashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(cl->cl_clientid.cl_id,
+ strhashval = ownerstr_hashval(cl->cl_clientid.cl_id,
&lock->v.new.owner);
lo = alloc_init_lock_stateowner(strhashval, cl, ost, lock);
if (lo == NULL)
@@ -4277,7 +4273,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
struct xdr_netobj *owner = &rlockowner->rl_owner;
struct list_head matches;
- unsigned int hashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
+ unsigned int hashval = ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
__be32 status;
dprintk("nfsd4_release_lockowner clientid: (%08x/%08x):\n",
@@ -4294,7 +4290,9 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
status = nfserr_locks_held;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&matches);
- list_for_each_entry(sop, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ list_for_each_entry(sop, &ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ if (sop->so_is_open_owner)
+ continue;
if (!same_owner_str(sop, owner, clid))
continue;
list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids,
@@ -4444,16 +4442,16 @@ static void release_openowner_sop(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
release_openowner(openowner(sop));
}
-static int nfsd_release_n_owners(u64 num,
- struct list_head hashtbl[],
- unsigned int hashtbl_size,
+static int nfsd_release_n_owners(u64 num, bool is_open_owner
void (*release_sop)(struct nfs4_stateowner *))
{
int i, count = 0;
struct nfs4_stateowner *sop, *next;
- for (i = 0; i < hashtbl_size; i++) {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(sop, next, &hashtbl[i], so_strhash) {
+ for (i = 0; i < OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(sop, next, &ownerstr_hashtbl[i], so_strhash) {
+ if (sop->so_is_open_owner != is_open_owner)
+ continue;
release_sop(sop);
if (++count == num)
return count;
@@ -4467,8 +4465,7 @@ void nfsd_forget_locks(u64 num)
int count;
nfs4_lock_state();
- count = nfsd_release_n_owners(num, lock_ownerstr_hashtbl,
- LOCK_HASH_SIZE, release_lockowner_sop);
+ count = nfsd_release_n_owners(num, false, release_lockowner_sop);
nfs4_unlock_state();
printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Forgot %d locks", count);
@@ -4479,8 +4476,7 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
int count;
nfs4_lock_state();
- count = nfsd_release_n_owners(num, open_ownerstr_hashtbl,
- OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE, release_openowner_sop);
+ count = nfsd_release_n_owners(num, true, release_openowner_sop);
nfs4_unlock_state();
printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Forgot %d open owners", count);
@@ -4549,11 +4545,8 @@ nfs4_state_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&file_hashtbl[i]);
}
- for (i = 0; i < OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&open_ownerstr_hashtbl[i]);
- }
- for (i = 0; i < LOCK_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ownerstr_hashtbl[i]);
}
memset(&onestateid, ~0, sizeof(stateid_t));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&close_lru);
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-08 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-14 11:44 [PATCH 00/25] nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:44 ` [PATCH 01/25] nfsd4: centralize handling of replay owners J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:44 ` [PATCH 02/25] nfsd4: cleanup seqid op stateowner usage J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:44 ` [PATCH 03/25] nfsd4: extend state lock over seqid replay logic J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-27 16:55 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-09-28 1:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-28 1:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-28 13:18 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-09-28 13:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 04/25] nfsd4: eliminate impossible open replay case J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 05/25] nfsd4: drop most stateowner refcounting J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 06/25] nfsd4: eliminate unused lt_stateowner J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 07/25] nfsd4: share common seqid checks J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 08/25] nfsd4: simplify check_open logic J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 09/25] nfsd4: move double-confirm test to open_confirm J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 10/25] nfsd4: move CLOSE_STATE special case to caller J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 11/25] nfsd4: split stateowners into open and lockowners J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 12/25] nfsd4: split out some free_generic_stateid code J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 13/25] nfsd4: rearrange to avoid a forward reference J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 14/25] nfsd4: split up find_stateid J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 15/25] nfsd4: split preprocess_seqid, cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 16/25] nfsd4: pass around typemask instead of flags J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 17/25] nfsd4: rename init_stateid J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 18/25] nfsd4: remove redundant stateid initialization J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 19/25] nfsd4: move some of nfs4_stateid into a separate structure J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 20/25] nfsd4: add common dl_stid field to delegation J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 21/25] nfsd4: share common stid-hashing helper function J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 22/25] nfsd4: hash deleg stateid's like any other J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 23/25] nfsd4: fix test_stateid for delegation stateid's J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 24/25] nfsd4: use deleg changes to cleanup preprocess_stateid_op J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 25/25] nfsd4: better stateid hashing J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:14 ` [PATCH 00/25] nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] nfsd4: replace oo_confirmed by flag bit J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] nfsd4: match close replays on stateid, not open owner id J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] nfsd4: simplify free_stateid J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] nfsd4: construct stateid from clientid and counter J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-27 16:10 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-09-28 15:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-03 14:43 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-03 14:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-03 15:13 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-03 15:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-04 15:52 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 16:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] nfsd4: hash closed stateid's like any other J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:36 ` [PATCH 00/25] nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd4: move client * to nfs4_stateid, add init_stid helper J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfsd4: use idr for stateid's J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd4: assume test_stateid always has session J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd4: look up stateid's per clientid J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-08 22:57 ` [PATCH 00/25] nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfsd4: hash lockowners to simplify RELEASE_LOCKOWNER J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-08 22:59 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-11-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd4: add a separate (lockowner, inode) lookup J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320793145-29070-2-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).