From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: chuck.lever@oracle.com
Cc: linux@razik.name, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Boot regression caused by commit 6829a048
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:32:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325871176.4629.35.camel@lappy> (raw)
Hi all,
I've noticed a boot regression caused by commit 6829a048 ("NFS: Retry
mounting NFSROOT") which has increased boot time by 95 seconds.
The scenario is as follows:
- A virtual guest running under the KVM tool.
- Guest is using kernel automatic IP DHCP configuration ("ip=dhcp").
- Guest is booting from a 9p device (which is not detected as block,
and gets mounted after NFS tries to do its mounts).
- No NFS server at all, no NFS parameters passed to the guest kernel.
Under this scenario, theres an additional 95 second delay before NFS
fails and tries to boot using 9p:
[...]
[ 6.505269] md: autorun ...
[ 6.506954] md: ... autorun DONE.
[ 101.522716] VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
[ 101.534499] VFS: Mounted root (9p filesystem) on device 0:18.
[...]
This probably happens since the NFS server isn't configured, so the
bootserver is automatically assumed to be the DHCP server, and with the
commit above we won't simply fail immediately when the NFS code fails
connecting to it.
I'm not quite sure about the correct solution for this. While I can
forcefully disable NFS, is it really the right solution? Should we be
retrying a NFS server even if one wasn't specifically set?
Thanks.
--
Sasha.
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-06 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-06 17:32 Sasha Levin [this message]
2012-01-06 18:26 ` Boot regression caused by commit 6829a048 Trond Myklebust
2012-01-06 23:32 ` Sasha Levin
2012-01-06 23:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2012-01-07 8:59 ` Sasha Levin
2012-01-06 18:29 ` Chuck Lever
2012-01-06 23:36 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325871176.4629.35.camel@lappy \
--to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@razik.name \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).