From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, linux@razik.name,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot regression caused by commit 6829a048
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:26:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325874404.32470.6.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325871176.4629.35.camel@lappy>
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 19:32 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've noticed a boot regression caused by commit 6829a048 ("NFS: Retry
> mounting NFSROOT") which has increased boot time by 95 seconds.
>
> The scenario is as follows:
> - A virtual guest running under the KVM tool.
> - Guest is using kernel automatic IP DHCP configuration ("ip=dhcp").
> - Guest is booting from a 9p device (which is not detected as block,
> and gets mounted after NFS tries to do its mounts).
> - No NFS server at all, no NFS parameters passed to the guest kernel.
>
> Under this scenario, theres an additional 95 second delay before NFS
> fails and tries to boot using 9p:
>
> [...]
> [ 6.505269] md: autorun ...
> [ 6.506954] md: ... autorun DONE.
> [ 101.522716] VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
> [ 101.534499] VFS: Mounted root (9p filesystem) on device 0:18.
> [...]
Can't you avoid the whole NFS root mount attempt by setting "root=2:0"
directly instead of relying on 'mount_root' to do it for you?
> This probably happens since the NFS server isn't configured, so the
> bootserver is automatically assumed to be the DHCP server, and with the
> commit above we won't simply fail immediately when the NFS code fails
> connecting to it.
>
> I'm not quite sure about the correct solution for this. While I can
> forcefully disable NFS, is it really the right solution? Should we be
> retrying a NFS server even if one wasn't specifically set?
One option might be to check the 'root_wait' flag. We could also add
nfsroot support for the 'retry=' mount option.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-06 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-06 17:32 Boot regression caused by commit 6829a048 Sasha Levin
2012-01-06 18:26 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2012-01-06 23:32 ` Sasha Levin
2012-01-06 23:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2012-01-07 8:59 ` Sasha Levin
2012-01-06 18:29 ` Chuck Lever
2012-01-06 23:36 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325874404.32470.6.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@razik.name \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).