linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux@razik.name, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, penberg@kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: Don't try mounting device as nfs root unless type fully matches
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:14:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1326111265.30169.5.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120107181221.GA3777@umich.edu>

On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 13:12 -0500, Jim Rees wrote:
> Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
>   On Jan 7, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>   
>   > Currently, we'll try mounting any device who's major device number is
>   > UNNAMED_MAJOR as NFS root. This would happen for non-NFS devices as well (such
>   > as 9p devices) but it wouldn't cause any issues since mounting the device
>   > as NFS would fail quickly and the code proceeded to doing the proper mount:
>   > 
>   > 	[  101.522716] VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
>   > 	[  101.534499] VFS: Mounted root (9p filesystem) on device 0:18.
>   > 
>   > Commit 6829a048 ("NFS: Retry mounting NFSROOT") has introduced retries when
>   > mounting NFS root, which means that now we don't immediately fail and instead
>   > it takes an additional 90+ seconds until we stop retrying.
>   > 
>   > This meant that it would take an additional 90 seconds to boot when we're not
>   > using a device type which gets detected in order before NFS.
>   
>   The long timeouts are kind of irrelevant, in my view.  The real problem is
>   that NFS was tried at all in this case.  That behavior was not introduced
>   by 6829a058.
> 
> The comment does imply that 6829a048 introduced a bug, but that's not true.
> It uncovered a bug that was there before.
> 
> I would change the part about "now we don't immediately fail."  It didn't
> immediately fail before, but the timeout was short enough that you wouldn't
> notice it.

I tried to point out that 6829a048 changed the behavior which was
described in the first paragraph, I didn't try to imply that 6829a048 is
buggy on its own.

I'm fine with changing the changelog to whatever will make it clearer.

-- 

Sasha.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-09 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-07  9:12 [PATCH] nfs: Don't try mounting device as nfs root unless type fully matches Sasha Levin
2012-01-07 16:57 ` Chuck Lever
2012-01-07 18:12   ` Jim Rees
2012-01-09 12:14     ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2012-03-31 15:21       ` Sasha Levin
2012-03-31 15:27         ` Chuck Lever
2012-03-31 21:09           ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-31 21:21             ` Sasha Levin
2012-03-31 21:24               ` Myklebust, Trond

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1326111265.30169.5.camel@lappy \
    --to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@razik.name \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rees@umich.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).