From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/14] svcrpc: ignore unknown address type in udp receive
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:57:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345582652-18476-9-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345582652-18476-1-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com>
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
How would this happen?
In any case, it appears this would be returned all the way up to the
caller of svc_recv(), and it's obvious that none of them are equipped to
handle it, and not clear what they would want to do with it anyway.
Let's just drop this and return -EAGAIN.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 06ae8a7..97ce23f 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static int svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
}
len = svc_addr_len(svc_addr(rqstp));
if (len == 0)
- return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+ return -EAGAIN;
rqstp->rq_addrlen = len;
if (skb->tstamp.tv64 == 0) {
skb->tstamp = ktime_get_real();
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 20:57 nfsd & svcrpc patches (mainly cleanup) for 3.7 J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 01/14] svcrpc: standardize svc_setup_socket return convention J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 02/14] svcrpc: clean up control flow J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 03/14] svcrpc: make svc_create_xprt enqueue on clearing XPT_BUSY J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 04/14] svcrpc: share some setup of listening sockets J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 05/14] nfsd: remove redundant "port" argument J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 06/14] nfsd: allow configuring nfsd to listen on 5-digit ports J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 21:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 07/14] svcrpc: minor udp code cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-08-21 21:02 ` [PATCH 08/14] svcrpc: ignore unknown address type in udp receive Chuck Lever
2012-08-21 21:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 21:29 ` Chuck Lever
2012-08-21 21:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 21:38 ` Chuck Lever
2012-08-21 21:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 09/14] svcrpc: make xpo_recvfrom return only >=0 J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 10/14] svcrpc: remove handling of unknown errors from svc_recv J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 11/14] svcrpc: make svc_xprt_received static J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 12/14] svcrpc: break up svc_recv J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 13/14] svcrpc: split up svc_handle_xprt J. Bruce Fields
2012-08-21 20:57 ` [PATCH 14/14] nfsd: document kernel interfaces for nfsd configuration J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1345582652-18476-9-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).