From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: break out comparator into separate function
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:11:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363698706-22036-3-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363698706-22036-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
Break out the function that compares the rqstp and checksum against a
reply cache entry. While we're at it, track the efficacy of the checksum
over the NFS data by tracking the cases where we would have incorrectly
matched a DRC entry if we had not tracked it or the length.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
index c61391e..48f5ef9 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
@@ -23,10 +23,22 @@
static struct hlist_head * cache_hash;
static struct list_head lru_head;
static struct kmem_cache *drc_slab;
-static unsigned int num_drc_entries;
+
+/* max number of entries allowed in the cache */
static unsigned int max_drc_entries;
/*
+ * Stats and other tracking of on the duplicate reply cache. All of these and
+ * the "rc" fields in nfsdstats are protected by the cache_lock
+ */
+
+/* total number of entries */
+static unsigned int num_drc_entries;
+
+/* cache misses due only to checksum comparison failures */
+static unsigned int payload_misses;
+
+/*
* Calculate the hash index from an XID.
*/
static inline u32 request_hash(u32 xid)
@@ -273,6 +285,26 @@ nfsd_cache_csum(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
return csum;
}
+static bool
+nfsd_cache_match(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __wsum csum, struct svc_cacherep *rp)
+{
+ /* Check RPC header info first */
+ if (rqstp->rq_xid != rp->c_xid || rqstp->rq_proc != rp->c_proc ||
+ rqstp->rq_prot != rp->c_prot || rqstp->rq_vers != rp->c_vers ||
+ rqstp->rq_arg.len != rp->c_len ||
+ !rpc_cmp_addr(svc_addr(rqstp), (struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr) ||
+ rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)) != rpc_get_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr))
+ return false;
+
+ /* compare checksum of NFS data */
+ if (csum != rp->c_csum) {
+ ++payload_misses;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* Search the request hash for an entry that matches the given rqstp.
* Must be called with cache_lock held. Returns the found entry or
@@ -283,18 +315,10 @@ nfsd_cache_search(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __wsum csum)
{
struct svc_cacherep *rp;
struct hlist_head *rh;
- __be32 xid = rqstp->rq_xid;
- u32 proto = rqstp->rq_prot,
- vers = rqstp->rq_vers,
- proc = rqstp->rq_proc;
- rh = &cache_hash[request_hash(xid)];
+ rh = &cache_hash[request_hash(rqstp->rq_xid)];
hlist_for_each_entry(rp, rh, c_hash) {
- if (xid == rp->c_xid && proc == rp->c_proc &&
- proto == rp->c_prot && vers == rp->c_vers &&
- rqstp->rq_arg.len == rp->c_len && csum == rp->c_csum &&
- rpc_cmp_addr(svc_addr(rqstp), (struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr) &&
- rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)) == rpc_get_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr))
+ if (nfsd_cache_match(rqstp, csum, rp))
return rp;
}
return NULL;
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 13:11 [PATCH 0/6] nfsd: duplicate reply cache improvements for 3.10 Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfsd: eliminate one of the DRC cache searches Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfsd: track memory utilization by the DRC Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: add new reply_cache_stats file in nfsdfs Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] nfsd: keep stats on worst hash balancing seen so far Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] nfsd: scale up the number of DRC hash buckets with cache size Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363698706-22036-3-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).