linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: break out comparator into separate function
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:11:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363698706-22036-3-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363698706-22036-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

Break out the function that compares the rqstp and checksum against a
reply cache entry. While we're at it, track the efficacy of the checksum
over the NFS data by tracking the cases where we would have incorrectly
matched a DRC entry if we had not tracked it or the length.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
index c61391e..48f5ef9 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
@@ -23,10 +23,22 @@
 static struct hlist_head *	cache_hash;
 static struct list_head 	lru_head;
 static struct kmem_cache	*drc_slab;
-static unsigned int		num_drc_entries;
+
+/* max number of entries allowed in the cache */
 static unsigned int		max_drc_entries;
 
 /*
+ * Stats and other tracking of on the duplicate reply cache. All of these and
+ * the "rc" fields in nfsdstats are protected by the cache_lock
+ */
+
+/* total number of entries */
+static unsigned int		num_drc_entries;
+
+/* cache misses due only to checksum comparison failures */
+static unsigned int		payload_misses;
+
+/*
  * Calculate the hash index from an XID.
  */
 static inline u32 request_hash(u32 xid)
@@ -273,6 +285,26 @@ nfsd_cache_csum(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 	return csum;
 }
 
+static bool
+nfsd_cache_match(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __wsum csum, struct svc_cacherep *rp)
+{
+	/* Check RPC header info first */
+	if (rqstp->rq_xid != rp->c_xid || rqstp->rq_proc != rp->c_proc ||
+	    rqstp->rq_prot != rp->c_prot || rqstp->rq_vers != rp->c_vers ||
+	    rqstp->rq_arg.len != rp->c_len ||
+	    !rpc_cmp_addr(svc_addr(rqstp), (struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr) ||
+	    rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)) != rpc_get_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr))
+		return false;
+
+	/* compare checksum of NFS data */
+	if (csum != rp->c_csum) {
+		++payload_misses;
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Search the request hash for an entry that matches the given rqstp.
  * Must be called with cache_lock held. Returns the found entry or
@@ -283,18 +315,10 @@ nfsd_cache_search(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __wsum csum)
 {
 	struct svc_cacherep	*rp;
 	struct hlist_head 	*rh;
-	__be32			xid = rqstp->rq_xid;
-	u32			proto =  rqstp->rq_prot,
-				vers = rqstp->rq_vers,
-				proc = rqstp->rq_proc;
 
-	rh = &cache_hash[request_hash(xid)];
+	rh = &cache_hash[request_hash(rqstp->rq_xid)];
 	hlist_for_each_entry(rp, rh, c_hash) {
-		if (xid == rp->c_xid && proc == rp->c_proc &&
-		    proto == rp->c_prot && vers == rp->c_vers &&
-		    rqstp->rq_arg.len == rp->c_len && csum == rp->c_csum &&
-		    rpc_cmp_addr(svc_addr(rqstp), (struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr) &&
-		    rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)) == rpc_get_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr))
+		if (nfsd_cache_match(rqstp, csum, rp))
 			return rp;
 	}
 	return NULL;
-- 
1.7.11.7


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-19 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-19 13:11 [PATCH 0/6] nfsd: duplicate reply cache improvements for 3.10 Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfsd: eliminate one of the DRC cache searches Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfsd: track memory utilization by the DRC Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: add new reply_cache_stats file in nfsdfs Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] nfsd: keep stats on worst hash balancing seen so far Jeff Layton
2013-03-19 13:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] nfsd: scale up the number of DRC hash buckets with cache size Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1363698706-22036-3-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).