From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6927 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935762Ab3DIUFY (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:05:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] libtirpc and nfs-utils fix for export lucid context From: Simo Sorce To: Steve Dickson Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list , libtirpc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <51646EF4.5010405@RedHat.com> References: <1365201425-21702-1-git-send-email-simo@redhat.com> <51646EF4.5010405@RedHat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:05:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1365537915.20560.47.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 15:41 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > On 05/04/13 18:37, Simo Sorce wrote: > > The following 2 patches go in tandem. > > One is for libtirpc and the other for nfs-utils. > How backwards compatible are these patches? > > Meaning will a patched nfs-utils work with a non-patch libtirpc and vises versus? > It appears that is the case... I just want to make sure I'm not missing > something... As far as I know fully backwards compatible. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York