From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: simo@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, neilb@suse.de
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] sunrpc: change handling of use-gss-proxy file
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 07:28:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1388579314-15255-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
Consider this patch a RFC at this point. This changes how the
use-gss-proxy file works, and alters the kernel upcall to delay a little
bit before giving up on it if gssproxy isn't up yet.
It's not heavily tested yet, but it seems to do the right thing...
I think the first patch isn't too controversial. The big question is
whether the initial upcall delay is desirable.
Thoughts?
Jeff Layton (5):
sunrpc: don't wait for write before allowing reads from use-gss-proxy
file
sunrpc: don't hang indefinitely in wait_for_gss_proxy
sunrpc: wait for gssproxy to start on initial upcall attempt before
falling back to legacy upcall
sunrpc: fix potential race between setting use_gss_proxy and the
upcall rpc_clnt
sunrpc: allow gssproxy to be explicitly disabled from userland
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--
1.8.4.2
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-01 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-01 12:28 Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-01-01 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] sunrpc: don't wait for write before allowing reads from use-gss-proxy file Jeff Layton
2014-01-02 21:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-02 22:26 ` Jeff Layton
2014-01-02 22:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-02 23:27 ` Jeff Layton
2014-01-03 8:14 ` Simo Sorce
2014-01-03 16:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-03 22:06 ` Simo Sorce
2014-01-03 22:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-04 15:28 ` Simo Sorce
2014-01-04 16:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-04 14:18 ` Jeff Layton
2014-01-05 22:37 ` NeilBrown
2014-01-05 22:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-05 23:30 ` NeilBrown
2014-01-05 23:38 ` Chuck Lever
2014-01-06 1:45 ` Jeff Layton
2014-01-06 6:36 ` Simo Sorce
2014-01-06 15:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-06 15:23 ` Simo Sorce
2014-01-01 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] sunrpc: don't hang indefinitely in wait_for_gss_proxy Jeff Layton
2014-01-01 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sunrpc: wait for gssproxy to start on initial upcall attempt before falling back to legacy upcall Jeff Layton
2014-01-02 21:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-02 23:10 ` Jeff Layton
2014-01-03 16:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-01-03 17:03 ` Jeff Layton
2014-01-01 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] sunrpc: fix potential race between setting use_gss_proxy and the upcall rpc_clnt Jeff Layton
2014-01-01 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] sunrpc: allow gssproxy to be explicitly disabled from userland Jeff Layton
2014-01-01 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] sunrpc: change handling of use-gss-proxy file Simo Sorce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1388579314-15255-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=simo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).