From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] nfs: consolidate rename code into one set of functions
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:06:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1395054418-14504-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
Summary of changes:
v2: remove -ERESTARTSYS error handling in nfs_rename
hardcode isdir value in fsnotify_nameremove call for sillyrenames
As Trond pointed out recently, it makes little sense to maintain two
separate sets of functions for handling RENAMEs.
This patchset converts nfs_rename to use the asynchronous RENAME
infrastructure that is already in place for sillyrenames. It also
does some cleanup to remove some minor layering violations, and
adds a patch to make the sillyrename code emit a fsnotify_nameremove
when a sillyrename succeeds.
I've lightly tested this set and it seems to do the right thing,
but it obviously could stand some time in linux-next.
Jeff Layton (5):
nfs: abstract out code needed to complete a sillyrename
nfs: make nfs_async_rename non-static
nfs: convert nfs_rename to use async_rename infrastructure
nfs: remove synchronous rename code
nfs: emit a fsnotify_nameremove call in sillyrename codepath
fs/nfs/dir.c | 13 +++++++++++--
fs/nfs/internal.h | 7 +++++++
fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c | 36 ------------------------------------
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 44 --------------------------------------------
fs/nfs/proc.c | 25 -------------------------
fs/nfs/unlink.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 1 -
include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 3 +--
8 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
--
1.8.5.3
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-17 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-17 11:06 Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-03-17 11:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] nfs: abstract out code needed to complete a sillyrename Jeff Layton
2014-03-17 11:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] nfs: make nfs_async_rename non-static Jeff Layton
2014-03-17 11:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] nfs: convert nfs_rename to use async_rename infrastructure Jeff Layton
2014-03-17 11:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] nfs: remove synchronous rename code Jeff Layton
2014-03-17 11:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] nfs: emit a fsnotify_nameremove call in sillyrename codepath Jeff Layton
2014-03-17 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] nfs: consolidate rename code into one set of functions Anna Schumaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1395054418-14504-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).