From: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
To: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] nfs: Ensure NFS_MOUNT_TCP is correctly set for v4 mounts
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 13:25:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1401384351-21993-1-git-send-email-smayhew@redhat.com> (raw)
When a 'mount -o remount...' is issued, the mount program reads the current
mount options from /etc/mtab so that it can pass them to the helper program. On
newer distros where /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts, this will result in
a call to nfs_show_mount_options(), which has the following snippet:
seq_printf(m, ",proto=%s",
rpc_peeraddr2str(nfss->client, RPC_DISPLAY_NETID));
which in most cases will result in the mount program passing 'proto=tcp' to the
mount.nfs4 program, which mount.nfs4 then passes in the data field of the mount
syscall.
nfs_remount() calls nfs_parse_mount_options(), where the NFS_MOUNT_TCP flag will
be set in the nfs_parsed_mount_data's flag field. But nfs_remount() then calls
nfs_compare_remount_data(), where we will fail the very first check:
static int
nfs_compare_remount_data(struct nfs_server *nfss,
struct nfs_parsed_mount_data *data)
{
if (data->flags != nfss->flags ||
...
return -EINVAL;
...
because NFS_MOUNT_TCP was never set in the nfs_server's flags field in the first
place.
As a result, the remount operation fails:
# mount -o remount,ro /mnt/t
mount.nfs4: an incorrect mount option was specified
The following patch corrects that issue by having nfs4_validate_mount_flags()
set the NFS_MOUNT_TCP flag when appropriate.
Scott Mayhew (1):
nfs: Ensure NFS_MOUNT_TCP is correctly set for v4 mounts
fs/nfs/super.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--
1.9.0
next reply other threads:[~2014-05-29 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 17:25 Scott Mayhew [this message]
2014-05-29 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/1] nfs: Ensure NFS_MOUNT_TCP is correctly set for v4 mounts Scott Mayhew
2014-05-29 17:33 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1401384351-21993-1-git-send-email-smayhew@redhat.com \
--to=smayhew@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).