From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
To: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] nfsd: Reorder nfsd_cache_match to check more powerful discriminators first
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 13:06:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407085564-3227-7-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407085564-3227-6-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
We would normally expect the xid and the checksum to be the best
discriminators. Check them before looking at the procedure number,
etc.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
index 74603654b7f9..122f69185ef5 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
@@ -338,20 +338,24 @@ nfsd_cache_csum(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
static bool
nfsd_cache_match(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __wsum csum, struct svc_cacherep *rp)
{
- /* Check RPC header info first */
- if (rqstp->rq_xid != rp->c_xid || rqstp->rq_proc != rp->c_proc ||
- rqstp->rq_prot != rp->c_prot || rqstp->rq_vers != rp->c_vers ||
- rqstp->rq_arg.len != rp->c_len ||
- !rpc_cmp_addr(svc_addr(rqstp), (struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr) ||
- rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)) != rpc_get_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr))
+ /* Check RPC XID first */
+ if (rqstp->rq_xid != rp->c_xid)
return false;
-
/* compare checksum of NFS data */
if (csum != rp->c_csum) {
++payload_misses;
return false;
}
+ /* Other discriminators */
+ if (rqstp->rq_proc != rp->c_proc ||
+ rqstp->rq_prot != rp->c_prot ||
+ rqstp->rq_vers != rp->c_vers ||
+ rqstp->rq_arg.len != rp->c_len ||
+ !rpc_cmp_addr(svc_addr(rqstp), (struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr) ||
+ rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)) != rpc_get_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr))
+ return false;
+
return true;
}
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-03 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-03 17:05 [PATCH 0/6] NFS DRC scalability patches Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfsd: Clean up drc cache in preparation for global spinlock elimination Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: convert the lru list into a per-bucket thing Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfsd: Remove the cache_hash list Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: convert num_drc_entries to an atomic_t Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06 ` [PATCH 5/6] nfsd: split DRC global spinlock into per-bucket locks Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2014-08-04 11:44 ` Jeff Layton
2014-08-04 11:45 ` [PATCH 0/6] NFS DRC scalability patches Jeff Layton
2014-08-05 20:51 ` Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1407085564-3227-7-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--to=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).