From: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Stable Tree <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4: nfs4_state_manager() vs. nfs_server_remove_lists()
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:50:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410965448-6110-1-git-send-email-steved@redhat.com> (raw)
There is a race between nfs4_state_manager() and
nfs_server_remove_lists() that happens during a nfsv3 mount.
The v3 mount notices there is already a supper block so
nfs_server_remove_lists() called which uses the nfs_client_lock
spin lock to synchronize access to the client list.
At the same time nfs4_state_manager() is running through
the client list looking for work to do, using the same
lock. When nfs4_state_manager() wins the race to the
list, a v3 client pointer is found and not ignored
properly which causes the panic.
Moving some protocol checks before the state checking
avoids the panic.
CC: Stable Tree <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c
index 53e435a..7ff4c02 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c
@@ -622,6 +622,16 @@ int nfs41_walk_client_list(struct nfs_client *new,
spin_lock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
list_for_each_entry(pos, &nn->nfs_client_list, cl_share_link) {
+
+ if (pos->rpc_ops != new->rpc_ops)
+ continue;
+
+ if (pos->cl_proto != new->cl_proto)
+ continue;
+
+ if (pos->cl_minorversion != new->cl_minorversion)
+ continue;
+
/* If "pos" isn't marked ready, we can't trust the
* remaining fields in "pos", especially the client
* ID and serverowner fields. Wait for CREATE_SESSION
@@ -647,15 +657,6 @@ int nfs41_walk_client_list(struct nfs_client *new,
if (pos->cl_cons_state != NFS_CS_READY)
continue;
- if (pos->rpc_ops != new->rpc_ops)
- continue;
-
- if (pos->cl_proto != new->cl_proto)
- continue;
-
- if (pos->cl_minorversion != new->cl_minorversion)
- continue;
-
if (!nfs4_match_clientids(pos, new))
continue;
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-17 14:50 Steve Dickson [this message]
2014-09-17 14:55 ` [PATCH] NFSv4: nfs4_state_manager() vs. nfs_server_remove_lists() Trond Myklebust
2014-09-17 15:00 ` Anna Schumaker
2014-09-18 13:17 ` Steve Dickson
2014-09-18 13:13 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1410965448-6110-1-git-send-email-steved@redhat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox