From: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/13] locks: consolidate NULL i_flctx checks in locks_remove_file
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:27:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421936877-27529-13-git-send-email-jeff.layton@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421936877-27529-1-git-send-email-jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
We have each of the locks_remove_* variants doing this individually.
Have the caller do it instead, and have locks_remove_flock and
locks_remove_lease just assume that it's a valid pointer.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
---
fs/locks.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index bd578700342d..2fc36b3772a0 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -2400,6 +2400,7 @@ void locks_remove_posix(struct file *filp, fl_owner_t owner)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_remove_posix);
+/* The i_flctx must be valid when calling into here */
static void
locks_remove_flock(struct file *filp)
{
@@ -2413,7 +2414,7 @@ locks_remove_flock(struct file *filp)
};
struct file_lock_context *flctx = file_inode(filp)->i_flctx;
- if (!flctx || list_empty(&flctx->flc_flock))
+ if (list_empty(&flctx->flc_flock))
return;
if (filp->f_op->flock)
@@ -2425,6 +2426,7 @@ locks_remove_flock(struct file *filp)
fl.fl_ops->fl_release_private(&fl);
}
+/* The i_flctx must be valid when calling into here */
static void
locks_remove_lease(struct file *filp)
{
@@ -2433,7 +2435,7 @@ locks_remove_lease(struct file *filp)
struct file_lock *fl, *tmp;
LIST_HEAD(dispose);
- if (!ctx || list_empty(&ctx->flc_lease))
+ if (list_empty(&ctx->flc_lease))
return;
spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
@@ -2448,6 +2450,9 @@ locks_remove_lease(struct file *filp)
*/
void locks_remove_file(struct file *filp)
{
+ if (!file_inode(filp)->i_flctx)
+ return;
+
/* remove any OFD locks */
locks_remove_posix(filp, filp);
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 14:27 [PATCH v3 00/13] locks: saner method for managing file locks Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] locks: add new struct list_head to struct file_lock Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] ceph: move spinlocking into ceph_encode_locks_to_buffer and ceph_count_locks Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] locks: move flock locks to file_lock_context Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] locks: convert posix " Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] locks: convert lease handling " Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] locks: remove i_flock field from struct inode Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] locks: clean up the lm_change prototype Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] locks: keep a count of locks on the flctx lists Jeff Layton
2015-01-22 14:27 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2015-01-22 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] locks: update comments that refer to inode->i_flock Jeff Layton
2015-02-02 20:29 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] locks: saner method for managing file locks Mike Marshall
2015-02-02 20:42 ` Jeff Layton
2015-02-03 18:01 ` Mike Marshall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421936877-27529-13-git-send-email-jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
--to=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox