From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Parallelise OPEN/OPEN_DOWNGRADE/CLOSE in NFSv4.x (x>0)
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:39:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422077968-116473-1-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> (raw)
Hi all,
The following patchset improves the tracking of stateids in the CLOSE code
to ensure that we can rely on it in situations where we remove the NFSv4.0
serialisation of state that shares the same open owners.
It then proceeds to add a series of changes to the NFSv4.0 seqid code to
ensure that it can be removed in the case of NFSv4.0 opens.
Only lightly tested so far, but it seems to be working...
In principle there is nothing stopping us from doing the same with byte
range locks; we only need to add better atomicity of stateid updates,
so that we can track the seqid number in the stateid and ensure that it
never regresses. The exercise has been left for the reader...
Cheers
Trond
Trond Myklebust (5):
NFSv4: Fix an atomicity problem in CLOSE
NFSv4: More CLOSE/OPEN races
NFSv4: Convert nfs_alloc_seqid() to return an ERR_PTR() if allocation
fails
NFSv4: Check for NULL argument in nfs_*_seqid() functions
NFSv4.1: Allow parallel OPEN/OPEN_DOWNGRADE/CLOSE
fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h | 3 +++
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------
fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c | 9 ++++++---
include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--
2.1.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-24 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-24 5:39 Trond Myklebust [this message]
2015-01-24 5:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] NFSv4: Fix an atomicity problem in CLOSE Trond Myklebust
2015-01-24 5:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] NFSv4: More CLOSE/OPEN races Trond Myklebust
2015-01-24 5:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] NFSv4: Convert nfs_alloc_seqid() to return an ERR_PTR() if allocation fails Trond Myklebust
2015-01-24 5:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] NFSv4: Check for NULL argument in nfs_*_seqid() functions Trond Myklebust
2015-01-24 5:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] NFSv4.1: Allow parallel OPEN/OPEN_DOWNGRADE/CLOSE Trond Myklebust
2015-01-24 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] NFSv4: Fix an atomicity problem in CLOSE Jeff Layton
2015-01-24 11:53 ` Jeff Layton
2015-01-24 11:58 ` [PATCH 0/5] Parallelise OPEN/OPEN_DOWNGRADE/CLOSE in NFSv4.x (x>0) Jeff Layton
2015-01-25 13:19 ` Jeff Layton
2015-01-25 15:14 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1422077968-116473-1-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--to=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox