From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd/blocklayout: pretend we can send deviceid notifications
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:48:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430063287-13621-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430063287-13621-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
Commit df52699e4fcef ("NFSv4.1: Don't cache deviceids that have no
notifications") causes the Linux NFS client stop caching deviceid
unless a server pretends to support deviceid notifications. While
this behavior is stupid and the language around this area in rfc5661
is a mess carified by an errata that I submittted, Trond insists
on this behavior. Not caching deviceids degrades block layout
performance massively as a GETDEVICEINFO is fairly expensive.
So add this hack to make the Linux client happy again.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
index 03d647b..58298fa6 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
@@ -181,6 +181,16 @@ nfsd4_block_proc_layoutcommit(struct inode *inode,
}
const struct nfsd4_layout_ops bl_layout_ops = {
+ /*
+ * Pretend that we send notification to the client. This is a blatant
+ * lie to force recent Linux clients to cache our device IDs.
+ * We rarely ever change the device ID, so the harm of leaking deviceids
+ * for a while isn't too bad. Unfortunately RFC5661 is a complete mess
+ * in this regard, but I filed errata 4119 for this a while ago, and
+ * hopefully the Linux client will eventually start caching deviceids
+ * without this again.
+ */
+ .notify_types = NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE,
.proc_getdeviceinfo = nfsd4_block_proc_getdeviceinfo,
.encode_getdeviceinfo = nfsd4_block_encode_getdeviceinfo,
.proc_layoutget = nfsd4_block_proc_layoutget,
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-26 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-26 15:48 two pNFS server fixes for 4.1 Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-26 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-04-26 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: fix pNFS return on close semantics Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-27 12:50 two pNFS server fixes for 4.1, V2 Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-27 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd/blocklayout: pretend we can send deviceid notifications Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-27 20:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430063287-13621-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).