linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd/blocklayout: pretend we can send deviceid notifications
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:48:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430063287-13621-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430063287-13621-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>

Commit df52699e4fcef ("NFSv4.1: Don't cache deviceids that have no
notifications") causes the Linux NFS client stop caching deviceid
unless a server pretends to support deviceid notifications.  While
this behavior is stupid and the language around this area in rfc5661
is a mess carified by an errata that I submittted, Trond insists
on this behavior.  Not caching deviceids degrades block layout
performance massively as a GETDEVICEINFO is fairly expensive.

So add this hack to make the Linux client happy again.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
index 03d647b..58298fa6 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
@@ -181,6 +181,16 @@ nfsd4_block_proc_layoutcommit(struct inode *inode,
 }
 
 const struct nfsd4_layout_ops bl_layout_ops = {
+	/*
+	 * Pretend that we send notification to the client.  This is a blatant
+	 * lie to force recent Linux clients to cache our device IDs.
+	 * We rarely ever change the device ID, so the harm of leaking deviceids
+	 * for a while isn't too bad.  Unfortunately RFC5661 is a complete mess
+	 * in this regard, but I filed errata 4119 for this a while ago, and
+	 * hopefully the Linux client will eventually start caching deviceids
+	 * without this again.
+	 */
+	.notify_types		= NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE,
 	.proc_getdeviceinfo	= nfsd4_block_proc_getdeviceinfo,
 	.encode_getdeviceinfo	= nfsd4_block_encode_getdeviceinfo,
 	.proc_layoutget		= nfsd4_block_proc_layoutget,
-- 
1.9.1


  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-26 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-26 15:48 two pNFS server fixes for 4.1 Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-26 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-04-26 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: fix pNFS return on close semantics Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-27 12:50 two pNFS server fixes for 4.1, V2 Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-27 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd/blocklayout: pretend we can send deviceid notifications Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-27 20:36   ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1430063287-13621-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).