From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: jlayton@poochiereds.net, trond.myklebust@primarydata.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: nfs4_put_lock_state() wants some nfs4_state on cleanup
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:34:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437579281-26810-1-git-send-email-bcodding@redhat.com> (raw)
Our QE folks are noticing the old leftover locks WARN popping up in RHEL7
(it's since been removed). While investigating upstream, I found I could
make this happen by locking, then closing and signaling a process in a loop:
#0 [ffff88007a4874a0] __schedule at ffffffff81736d8a
#1 [ffff88007a4874f0] schedule at ffffffff81737407
#2 [ffff88007a487510] do_exit at ffffffff8109e18f
#3 [ffff88007a487590] oops_end at ffffffff8101822e
#4 [ffff88007a4875c0] no_context at ffffffff81063b55
#5 [ffff88007a487630] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff81063e1b
#6 [ffff88007a487680] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff81063fa3
#7 [ffff88007a487690] __do_page_fault at ffffffff81064251
#8 [ffff88007a4876f0] trace_do_page_fault at ffffffff81064677
#9 [ffff88007a487730] do_async_page_fault at ffffffff8105ed0e
#10 [ffff88007a487750] async_page_fault at ffffffff8173d078
[exception RIP: nfs4_put_lock_state+82]
RIP: ffffffffa02dd5b2 RSP: ffff88007a487808 RFLAGS: 00010207
RAX: 0000003fffffffff RBX: ffff8800351d2000 RCX: 0000000000000024
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000009
RBP: ffff88007a487818 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000028b R11: 0000000000aaaaaa R12: ffff88003675e240
R13: ffff88003504d5b0 R14: ffff88007a487b30 R15: ffff880035097c40
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
#11 [ffff88007a487800] nfs4_put_lock_state at ffffffffa02dd59b [nfsv4]
#12 [ffff88007a487820] nfs4_fl_release_lock at ffffffffa02dd605 [nfsv4]
#13 [ffff88007a487830] locks_release_private at ffffffff81258548
#14 [ffff88007a487850] locks_free_lock at ffffffff81258dbb
#15 [ffff88007a487870] locks_dispose_list at ffffffff81258f68
#16 [ffff88007a4878a0] __posix_lock_file at ffffffff81259ab6
#17 [ffff88007a487930] posix_lock_inode_wait at ffffffff8125a02a
#18 [ffff88007a4879b0] do_vfs_lock at ffffffffa02c4687 [nfsv4]
#19 [ffff88007a4879c0] nfs4_proc_lock at ffffffffa02cc1a1 [nfsv4]
#20 [ffff88007a487a70] do_unlk at ffffffffa0273d9e [nfs]
#21 [ffff88007a487ac0] nfs_lock at ffffffffa0273fa9 [nfs]
#22 [ffff88007a487b10] vfs_lock_file at ffffffff8125a76e
#23 [ffff88007a487b20] locks_remove_posix at ffffffff8125a819
#24 [ffff88007a487c10] locks_remove_posix at ffffffff8125a878
#25 [ffff88007a487c20] filp_close at ffffffff812092a2
#26 [ffff88007a487c50] put_files_struct at ffffffff812290c5
#27 [ffff88007a487ca0] exit_files at ffffffff812291c1
#28 [ffff88007a487cc0] do_exit at ffffffff8109dc5f
#29 [ffff88007a487d40] do_group_exit at ffffffff8109e3b5
#30 [ffff88007a487d70] get_signal at ffffffff810a9504
#31 [ffff88007a487e00] do_signal at ffffffff81014447
#32 [ffff88007a487f30] do_notify_resume at ffffffff81014b0e
#33 [ffff88007a487f50] int_signal at ffffffff8173b2fc
The nfs4_lock_state->ls_state pointer is pointing to free memory.
I think what's happening here is that a signal is bumping us out of
do_unlk() waiting on the io_counter while we try to release locks on
__fput(). Since the lock is never released, it sticks around on the inode
until another lock replaces it, and when it is freed it wants some bits from
nfs4_state, but the nfs4_state was already cleaned up.
Probably we need to do a better job not bailing out of do_unlk on file
close, but while I work on that, something like the following keeps the
nfs4_state around for proper cleanup of the nfs4_lock_state:
Is this sane?
Ben
8<--------------------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-22 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-22 15:34 Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2015-07-22 16:34 ` nfs4_put_lock_state() wants some nfs4_state on cleanup Jeff Layton
2015-08-07 11:49 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-08-07 13:22 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-07 13:49 ` Benjamin Coddington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1437579281-26810-1-git-send-email-bcodding@redhat.com \
--to=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox