From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: Allow TCP to replace the bh-safe lock in receive path
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:03:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444086211-4811-3-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444086211-4811-2-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
This patch attempts to eke out a couple more iops by allowing the TCP code
to replace bh-safe spinlock with an ordinary one while receiving data. We
still need to use the bh-safe spinlock when completing.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
---
net/sunrpc/xprt.c | 4 ++++
net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
index 2e98f4a243e5..e604bb680bcf 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
@@ -951,6 +951,7 @@ void xprt_transmit(struct rpc_task *task)
/*
* Add to the list only if we're expecting a reply
*/
+ spin_lock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
/* Update the softirq receive buffer */
memcpy(&req->rq_private_buf, &req->rq_rcv_buf,
@@ -958,6 +959,7 @@ void xprt_transmit(struct rpc_task *task)
/* Add request to the receive list */
list_add_tail(&req->rq_list, &xprt->recv);
spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
xprt_reset_majortimeo(req);
/* Turn off autodisconnect */
del_singleshot_timer_sync(&xprt->timer);
@@ -1278,6 +1280,7 @@ void xprt_release(struct rpc_task *task)
task->tk_ops->rpc_count_stats(task, task->tk_calldata);
else if (task->tk_client)
rpc_count_iostats(task, task->tk_client->cl_metrics);
+ spin_lock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
xprt->ops->release_xprt(xprt, task);
if (xprt->ops->release_request)
@@ -1289,6 +1292,7 @@ void xprt_release(struct rpc_task *task)
mod_timer(&xprt->timer,
xprt->last_used + xprt->idle_timeout);
spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
if (req->rq_buffer)
xprt->ops->buf_free(req->rq_buffer);
xprt_inject_disconnect(xprt);
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index 58dc90ccebb6..063d2eb20d8e 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -1246,21 +1246,24 @@ static inline int xs_tcp_read_reply(struct rpc_xprt *xprt,
dprintk("RPC: read reply XID %08x\n", ntohl(transport->tcp_xid));
/* Find and lock the request corresponding to this xid */
- spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ spin_lock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
req = xprt_lookup_rqst(xprt, transport->tcp_xid);
if (!req) {
dprintk("RPC: XID %08x request not found!\n",
ntohl(transport->tcp_xid));
- spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
return -1;
}
xs_tcp_read_common(xprt, desc, req);
- if (!(transport->tcp_flags & TCP_RCV_COPY_DATA))
+ if (!(transport->tcp_flags & TCP_RCV_COPY_DATA)) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
xprt_complete_rqst(req->rq_task, transport->tcp_copied);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ }
- spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -1280,10 +1283,10 @@ static int xs_tcp_read_callback(struct rpc_xprt *xprt,
struct rpc_rqst *req;
/* Look up and lock the request corresponding to the given XID */
- spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ spin_lock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
req = xprt_lookup_bc_request(xprt, transport->tcp_xid);
if (req == NULL) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
printk(KERN_WARNING "Callback slot table overflowed\n");
xprt_force_disconnect(xprt);
return -1;
@@ -1294,7 +1297,7 @@ static int xs_tcp_read_callback(struct rpc_xprt *xprt,
if (!(transport->tcp_flags & TCP_RCV_COPY_DATA))
xprt_complete_bc_request(req, transport->tcp_copied);
- spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
return 0;
}
--
2.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-05 23:03 [RFC PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Refactor TCP receive Trond Myklebust
2015-10-05 23:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: Move TCP receive data path into a workqueue context Trond Myklebust
2015-10-05 23:03 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2015-10-06 0:10 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: Allow TCP to replace the bh-safe lock in receive path Chuck Lever
2015-10-06 3:55 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-10-06 13:56 ` Chuck Lever
2015-10-06 14:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2015-10-06 14:58 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444086211-4811-3-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--to=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox