From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
To: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: don't match flexfiles mirrors that have different creds
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:52:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461927124.32715.4.camel@poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460210433-20435-1-git-send-email-jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 10:00 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> When we're comparing mirrors to avoid adding duplicates to the to the
> list, we must also consider the creds when comparing them. Otherwise,
> mirrors that differ only by the credential will be improperly merged.
>
> This is a problem if the client does a LAYOUTGET for a READ layout
> first and then one for a RW, and the server sends a layout with a
> non-usable uid for the READ layout. The RW mirror entry will get
> dropped on the second layoutget as the client thinks the mirror is
> identical to the one from the first. Then, when it goes to do a
> WRITE, it ends up using the creds from the READ layout and the write
> fails with EACCES.
>
> Another possibility is to allow the RW segment to supersede the READ
> one. The problem there is that the RW layout is returned, then the
> client will still end up using the creds in the RW layout, which may
> not be correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
> index 0cb1abd535e3..5d0789a41bc2 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ ff_layout_add_mirror(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> continue;
> if (!ff_mirror_match_fh(mirror, pos))
> continue;
> + if (mirror->uid != pos->uid || mirror->gid != pos->gid)
> + continue;
> if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&pos->ref)) {
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> return pos;
Self-NAK on this patch. As Trond pointed out to me in a private
conversation, we rely on this merging to handle layout stats correctly.
The patchset I sent with the cover letter below should supersede this
patch.
[PATCH v2 0/7] nfs/sunrpc: fix flexfiles credential handling
Thanks!
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-09 14:00 [PATCH] nfs: don't match flexfiles mirrors that have different creds Jeff Layton
2016-04-29 10:52 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461927124.32715.4.camel@poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).