From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47467 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125AbcEWQoD (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2016 12:44:03 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CAA7C064277 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 16:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from steved.boston.devel.redhat.com (vpn-59-118.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.59.118]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4NGIT53012144 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:18:30 -0400 From: Steve Dickson To: Linux NFS Mailing list Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Create a DNS SRV record of the ID mapping domain Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:18:26 -0400 Message-Id: <1464020307-8806-1-git-send-email-steved@redhat.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I have a customer that requested the domain used to do the ID mapping be available via DNS SVR record. I didn't think was that bad of an idea. IPA and FedFS use SRV records which seem to work out pretty well. This patch is heavily based on the FedFS code. ;-) My only question is do we want libnfsidmap to be dependent on the resolver library. There has been some talk about moving libnfsidmap into nfs-utils which means nfs-utils would be dependent the resolver library. Note, this is not complete. If we are going to do this I have to document it somehow, either in the man page or idmap.conf or both. Just looking for thoughts... good/bad idea?? Steve Dickson (1): libnfsidmap: Query DNS for the NFSv4 ID domain configure.ac | 1 + libnfsidmap.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.5.0