From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] SUNRPC: Fix suspicious enobufs issues.
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:04:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465931046-30696-5-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465931046-30696-4-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
The current test is racy when dealing with fast NICs.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index 646170d0cb86..6b3efeb3edc5 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -642,6 +642,7 @@ static int xs_tcp_send_request(struct rpc_task *task)
struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
struct xdr_buf *xdr = &req->rq_snd_buf;
bool zerocopy = true;
+ bool vm_wait = false;
int status;
int sent;
@@ -677,15 +678,33 @@ static int xs_tcp_send_request(struct rpc_task *task)
return 0;
}
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(sent == 0 && status == 0);
+
+ if (status == -EAGAIN ) {
+ /*
+ * Return EAGAIN if we're sure we're hitting the
+ * socket send buffer limits.
+ */
+ if (test_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &transport->sock->flags))
+ break;
+ /*
+ * Did we hit a memory allocation failure?
+ */
+ if (sent == 0) {
+ status = -ENOBUFS;
+ if (vm_wait)
+ break;
+ /* Retry, knowing now that we're below the
+ * socket send buffer limit
+ */
+ vm_wait = true;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
if (status < 0)
break;
- if (sent == 0) {
- status = -EAGAIN;
- break;
- }
+ vm_wait = false;
}
- if (status == -EAGAIN && sk_stream_is_writeable(transport->inet))
- status = -ENOBUFS;
switch (status) {
case -ENOTSOCK:
--
2.5.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 19:04 [PATCH 1/5] SUNRPC: Small optimisation of client receive Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] SUNRPC: Consolidate xs_tcp_data_ready and xs_data_ready Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] SUNRPC: RPC transport queue must be low latency Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] SUNRPC: Reduce latency when send queue is congested Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:04 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1465931046-30696-5-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--to=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).