linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/12] NFS: Fix O_DIRECT verifier problems
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:05:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465931115-30784-8-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465931115-30784-7-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

We should not be interested in looking at the value of the stable field,
since that could take any value.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
---
 fs/nfs/direct.c   | 10 ++++++++--
 fs/nfs/internal.h |  7 +++++++
 fs/nfs/write.c    |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index 979b3c4dee6a..d6d43b5eafb3 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ static void nfs_direct_set_hdr_verf(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(verfp->committed < 0);
 }
 
+static int nfs_direct_cmp_verf(const struct nfs_writeverf *v1,
+		const struct nfs_writeverf *v2)
+{
+	return nfs_write_verifier_cmp(&v1->verifier, &v2->verifier);
+}
+
 /*
  * nfs_direct_cmp_hdr_verf - compare verifier for pgio header
  * @dreq - direct request possibly spanning multiple servers
@@ -215,7 +221,7 @@ static int nfs_direct_set_or_cmp_hdr_verf(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
 		nfs_direct_set_hdr_verf(dreq, hdr);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	return memcmp(verfp, &hdr->verf, sizeof(struct nfs_writeverf));
+	return nfs_direct_cmp_verf(verfp, &hdr->verf);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -238,7 +244,7 @@ static int nfs_direct_cmp_commit_data_verf(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
 	if (verfp->committed < 0)
 		return 1;
 
-	return memcmp(verfp, &data->verf, sizeof(struct nfs_writeverf));
+	return nfs_direct_cmp_verf(verfp, &data->verf);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/fs/nfs/internal.h b/fs/nfs/internal.h
index 5154fa65a2f2..150a8eb0f323 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/internal.h
@@ -506,6 +506,13 @@ extern int nfs_migrate_page(struct address_space *,
 #define nfs_migrate_page NULL
 #endif
 
+static inline int
+nfs_write_verifier_cmp(const struct nfs_write_verifier *v1,
+		const struct nfs_write_verifier *v2)
+{
+	return memcmp(v1->data, v2->data, sizeof(v1->data));
+}
+
 /* unlink.c */
 extern struct rpc_task *
 nfs_async_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct inode *new_dir,
diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
index b13d48881d3a..3087fb6f1983 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -1789,7 +1789,7 @@ static void nfs_commit_release_pages(struct nfs_commit_data *data)
 
 		/* Okay, COMMIT succeeded, apparently. Check the verifier
 		 * returned by the server against all stored verfs. */
-		if (!memcmp(&req->wb_verf, &data->verf.verifier, sizeof(req->wb_verf))) {
+		if (!nfs_write_verifier_cmp(&req->wb_verf, &data->verf.verifier)) {
 			/* We have a match */
 			nfs_inode_remove_request(req);
 			dprintk(" OK\n");
-- 
2.5.5


  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-14 19:05 [PATCH 01/12] NFS: Don't flush caches for a getattr that races with writeback Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05 ` [PATCH 02/12] NFS: Cache access checks more aggressively Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05   ` [PATCH 03/12] NFS: Cache aggressively when file is open for writing Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05     ` [PATCH 04/12] NFS: Kill NFS_INO_NFS_INO_FLUSHING: it is a performance killer Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05       ` [PATCH 05/12] NFS: writepage of a single page should not be synchronous Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05         ` [PATCH 06/12] NFS: Don't hold the inode lock across fsync() Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05           ` [PATCH 07/12] NFS: Don't enable deep stack recursion when doing memory reclaim Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05             ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2016-06-14 19:05               ` [PATCH 09/12] NFS: Ensure we reset the write verifier 'committed' value on resend Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05                 ` [PATCH 10/12] NFS: Do not serialise O_DIRECT reads and writes Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05                   ` [PATCH 11/12] NFS: Don't count O_DIRECT reads in the inode->i_dio_count Trond Myklebust
2016-06-14 19:05                     ` [PATCH 12/12] NFS: Clean up nfs_direct_complete() Trond Myklebust
2016-06-15  7:16                     ` [PATCH 11/12] NFS: Don't count O_DIRECT reads in the inode->i_dio_count Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 14:36                       ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-15 14:41                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 14:50                           ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-15 14:53                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15  7:13                   ` [PATCH 10/12] NFS: Do not serialise O_DIRECT reads and writes Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 14:29                     ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-15 14:48                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 14:52                         ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-15 14:56                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 15:09                             ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-15 15:14                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 15:45                                 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-16  9:12                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15  7:09             ` [PATCH 07/12] NFS: Don't enable deep stack recursion when doing memory reclaim Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15  7:08           ` [PATCH 06/12] NFS: Don't hold the inode lock across fsync() Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 14:47             ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-15 14:54               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-17  1:11     ` [PATCH 03/12] NFS: Cache aggressively when file is open for writing Oleg Drokin
2016-06-17 14:01       ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1465931115-30784-8-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    --to=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).