From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] NFSv4: Fix stateid used when flock locks in use.
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:39:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147623977637.19592.12766016823334433969.stgit@noble> (raw)
I received no comments for my RFC series I sent a week ago, so I'll
assume no-one objects :-)
I've revised the series a little. In particular I just add a
lockowner rather than a whole nfs_lock_context to the open_context.
I've also added to patches which combine to remove the nfs_lockowner
structure.
I think this is ready to be queued for -next
Thanks,
NeilBrown
---
NeilBrown (5):
NFS: remove l_pid field from nfs_lockowner
NFSv4: add flock_owner to open context
NFSv4: change nfs4_select_rw_stateid to take a lock_context inplace of lock_owner
NFSv4: enhance nfs4_copy_lock_stateid to use a flock stateid if there is one
NFS: discard nfs_lockowner structure.
fs/nfs/dir.c | 6 +++---
fs/nfs/inode.c | 14 +++++++-------
fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h | 2 +-
fs/nfs/nfs4file.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 +++-----------
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
fs/nfs/pagelist.c | 3 +--
fs/nfs/write.c | 3 +--
include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 10 +++-------
9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
--
Signature
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-12 2:39 NeilBrown [this message]
2016-10-12 2:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] NFSv4: add flock_owner to open context NeilBrown
2016-10-12 3:33 ` [PATCH 2/5 - version 2] " NeilBrown
2016-10-12 11:32 ` Jeff Layton
2016-10-12 2:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] NFS: remove l_pid field from nfs_lockowner NeilBrown
2016-10-12 11:28 ` Jeff Layton
2016-10-12 22:59 ` NeilBrown
2016-10-12 2:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] NFSv4: enhance nfs4_copy_lock_stateid to use a flock stateid if there is one NeilBrown
2016-10-12 2:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] NFSv4: change nfs4_select_rw_stateid to take a lock_context inplace of lock_owner NeilBrown
2016-10-12 12:33 ` Jeff Layton
2016-10-12 13:48 ` Anna Schumaker
2016-10-13 4:04 ` NeilBrown
2016-10-25 19:49 ` Jeff Layton
2016-10-13 4:15 ` NeilBrown
2016-10-12 2:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] NFS: discard nfs_lockowner structure NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147623977637.19592.12766016823334433969.stgit@noble \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox