From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Fix general protection fault in release_lock_stateid()
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:46:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477766810.13215.12.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161029183113.12077.81804.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 14:31 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> When I push NFSv4.1 / RDMA hard, (xfstests generic/089, for example),
> I get this crash on the server:
>
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: Modules linked in: cts rpcsec_gss_krb5 iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support sb_edac edac_core x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm btrfs irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper cryptd xor pcspkr raid6_pq i2c_i801 i2c_smbus lpc_ich mfd_core sg mei_me mei ioatdma shpchp wmi ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler rpcrdma ib_ipoib rdma_ucm acpi_power_meter acpi_pad ib_ucm ib_uverbs ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c mlx4_ib mlx4_en ib_core sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ast drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops ttm drm crc32c_intel igb ahci libahci ptp mlx4_core pps_core dca libata i2c_algo_bit i2c_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: CPU: 7 PID: 1558 Comm: nfsd Not tainted 4.9.0-rc2-00005-g82cd754 #8
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10SRL-F, BIOS 1.0c 09/09/2015
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: task: ffff880835c3a100 task.stack: ffff8808420d8000
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa05a759f>] [<ffffffffa05a759f>] release_lock_stateid+0x1f/0x60 [nfsd]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff8808420dbce0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: RAX: ffff88084e6660f0 RBX: ffff88084e667020 RCX: 0000000000000000
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88084e667020
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: RBP: ffff8808420dbcf8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: R10: ffff880835c3a100 R11: ffff880835c3aca8 R12: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: R13: ffff88084e6670d8 R14: ffff880835f546f0 R15: ffff880835f1c548
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88087bdc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: CR2: 00007ff020389000 CR3: 0000000001c06000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: Stack:
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: ffff88084e667020 0000000000000000 ffff88084e6670d8 ffff8808420dbd20
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: ffffffffa05ac80d ffff880835f54548 ffff88084e640008 ffff880835f545b0
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: ffff8808420dbd70 ffffffffa059803d ffff880835f1c768 0000000000000870
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: Call Trace:
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffffa05ac80d>] nfsd4_free_stateid+0xfd/0x1b0 [nfsd]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffffa059803d>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x40d/0x690 [nfsd]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffffa0583114>] nfsd_dispatch+0xd4/0x1d0 [nfsd]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffffa047bbf9>] svc_process_common+0x3d9/0x700 [sunrpc]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffffa047ca64>] svc_process+0xf4/0x330 [sunrpc]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffffa05827ca>] nfsd+0xfa/0x160 [nfsd]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffffa05826d0>] ? nfsd_destroy+0x170/0x170 [nfsd]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffff810b367b>] kthread+0x10b/0x120
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffff810b3570>] ? kthread_stop+0x280/0x280
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: [<ffffffff8174e8ba>] ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x40
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: Code: c3 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 55 41 54 53 48 8b 87 b0 00 00 00 48 89 fb 4c 8b a0 98 00 00 00 <49> 8b 44 24 20 48 8d b8 80 03 00 00 e8 10 66 1a e1 48 89 df e8
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: RIP [<ffffffffa05a759f>] release_lock_stateid+0x1f/0x60 [nfsd]
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: RSP <ffff8808420dbce0>
> Oct 28 22:04:30 klimt kernel: ---[ end trace cf5d0b371973e167 ]---
>
> Jeff Layton says:
> >
> > Hm...now that I look though, this is a little suspicious:
> >
> > struct nfs4_openowner *oo = openowner(stp->st_openstp->st_stateowner);
> >
> > I wonder if it's possible for the openstateid to have already been
> > destroyed at this point.
> >
> > We might be better off doing something like this to get the client pointer:
> >
> > stp->st_stid.sc_client;
> >
> > ...which should be more direct and less dependent on other stateids
> > staying valid.
>
> With the suggested change, I am no longer able to reproduce the above oops.
>
> Fix-suggested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 42691398be08 ('nfsd: Fix race between FREE_STATEID and LOCK')
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 9752beb..34b38fc 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -1238,12 +1238,12 @@ static bool unhash_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
>
> static void release_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
> {
> - struct nfs4_openowner *oo = openowner(stp->st_openstp->st_stateowner);
> + struct nfs4_client *clp = stp->st_stid.sc_client;
> bool unhashed;
>
> - spin_lock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
> + spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> unhashed = unhash_lock_stateid(stp);
> - spin_unlock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> if (unhashed)
> nfs4_put_stid(&stp->st_stid);
> }
>
Nice!
Can you also change the lockdep assert in unhash_lock_stateid as well? I
think we could hit the same crash there.
I also wonder whether we ought to just have the lock stateids hold a
reference to st_openstp, but I'm not sure whether that would screw up
the open stateid refcounting. I'll take a look over the code sometime
soon and see whether that makes sense.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-29 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-29 18:31 [PATCH] nfsd: Fix general protection fault in release_lock_stateid() Chuck Lever
2016-10-29 18:46 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1477766810.13215.12.camel@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).