linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock()
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:12:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487765530.2886.7.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <963d9833fd2a4a4a9e936fb951b45bdf007ef9c8.1487691345.git.bcodding@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 10:39 -0500, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> We only need to check lock exclusive/shared types against open mode when
> flock() is used on NFS, so move it into the flock-specific path instead of
> checking it for all locks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/file.c     | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 --------------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
> index 26dbe8b0c10d..a490f45df4db 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
> @@ -820,9 +820,23 @@ int nfs_flock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
>  	if (NFS_SERVER(inode)->flags & NFS_MOUNT_LOCAL_FLOCK)
>  		is_local = 1;
>  
> -	/* We're simulating flock() locks using posix locks on the server */
> -	if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
> +	/*
> +	 * VFS doesn't require the open mode to match a flock() lock's type.
> +	 * NFS, however, may simulate flock() locking with posix locking which
> +	 * requires the open mode to match the lock type.
> +	 */
> +	switch (fl->fl_type) {
> +	case F_UNLCK:
>  		return do_unlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
> +	case F_RDLCK:
> +		if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
> +			return -EBADF;
> +		break;
> +	case F_WRLCK:
> +		if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> +			return -EBADF;
> +	}
> +
>  	return do_setlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_flock);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 9388899e4050..91f88bfbbe79 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -6592,20 +6592,6 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
>  	    !test_bit(NFS_STATE_POSIX_LOCKS, &state->flags))
>  		return -ENOLCK;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
> -	 * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
> -	 */
> -	switch (request->fl_type) {
> -	case F_RDLCK:
> -		if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
> -			return -EBADF;
> -		break;
> -	case F_WRLCK:
> -		if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> -			return -EBADF;
> -	}
> -
>  	status = nfs4_set_lock_state(state, request);
>  	if (status != 0)
>  		return status;

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-22 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 15:39 [PATCH v3 0/4] Skipped unlocks Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-21 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] NFS4: remove a redundant lock range check Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-21 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock() Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-22 12:12   ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2017-02-21 15:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] locks: Set FL_CLOSE when removing flock locks on close() Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-22 12:13   ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-22 12:25     ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-22 13:25       ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-22 13:27         ` Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-21 15:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] NFS: Always send an unlock for FL_CLOSE Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-22 13:20   ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-22 14:10     ` Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-22 15:42       ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-22 16:27         ` Trond Myklebust
2017-02-22 17:39           ` Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-22 19:20             ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 11:24               ` Benjamin Coddington
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-17 18:46 [PATCH v2 0/4] Skipped unlocks Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-17 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock() Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-17 18:37 [PATCH 0/4] Skipped unlocks Benjamin Coddington
2017-02-17 18:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock() Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1487765530.2886.7.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).