From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
bfields@fieldses.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock()
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:48:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491054539.18117.2.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe45f49878bdbe361bfeb99cbd92401fccbdb2f6.1491015671.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 23:15 -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> We only need to check lock exclusive/shared types against open mode when
> flock() is used on NFS, so move it into the flock-specific path instead of
> checking it for all locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/file.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 --------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
> index 26dbe8b0c10d..a490f45df4db 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
> @@ -820,9 +820,23 @@ int nfs_flock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
> if (NFS_SERVER(inode)->flags & NFS_MOUNT_LOCAL_FLOCK)
> is_local = 1;
>
> - /* We're simulating flock() locks using posix locks on the server */
> - if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
> + /*
> + * VFS doesn't require the open mode to match a flock() lock's type.
> + * NFS, however, may simulate flock() locking with posix locking which
> + * requires the open mode to match the lock type.
> + */
> + switch (fl->fl_type) {
> + case F_UNLCK:
> return do_unlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
> + case F_RDLCK:
> + if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
> + return -EBADF;
> + break;
> + case F_WRLCK:
> + if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> + return -EBADF;
> + }
> +
> return do_setlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_flock);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 9388899e4050..91f88bfbbe79 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -6592,20 +6592,6 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
> !test_bit(NFS_STATE_POSIX_LOCKS, &state->flags))
> return -ENOLCK;
>
> - /*
> - * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
> - * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
> - */
> - switch (request->fl_type) {
> - case F_RDLCK:
> - if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
> - return -EBADF;
> - break;
> - case F_WRLCK:
> - if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> - return -EBADF;
> - }
> -
> status = nfs4_set_lock_state(state, request);
> if (status != 0)
> return status;
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-01 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-01 3:15 [PATCH v4 0/6] Skipped unlocks Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-01 3:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] NFS4: remove a redundant lock range check Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-01 13:47 ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-01 3:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock() Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-01 13:48 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2017-04-01 3:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] locks: Set FL_CLOSE when removing flock locks on close() Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-01 13:50 ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-03 9:44 ` Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-01 3:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] NFS: Add an iocounter wait function for async RPC tasks Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-02 14:29 ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-03 9:42 ` Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-01 3:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] lockd: Introduce nlmclnt_operations Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-01 14:05 ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-03 9:40 ` Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-06 11:19 ` Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-01 3:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] NFS: Always wait for I/O completion before unlock Benjamin Coddington
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-06 11:23 [PATCH v5 0/6] Skipped unlocks Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-06 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock() Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-11 16:50 [PATCH v6 0/6] Skipped unlocks Benjamin Coddington
2017-04-11 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock() Benjamin Coddington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491054539.18117.2.camel@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).