linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>,
	selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>,
	"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] nfs: update labeling behavior on a superblock when submounting
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 10:24:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495808645.12091.10.camel@tycho.nsa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170525210754.24265-3-smayhew@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 17:07 -0400, Scott Mayhew wrote:
> When the client traverses from filesystem exported without the
> "security_label" option to one exported with the "security_label"
> option, it needs to pass SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS to
> security_sb_set_mnt_opts() so that the new superblock has SBLABEL_MNT
> set in its security mount options.  Otherwise, attempts to set
> security
> labels via setxattr over NFSv4.2 will fail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/super.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
> index 2f3822a..d7a3b89 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
> @@ -2544,10 +2544,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_set_sb_security);
>  int nfs_clone_sb_security(struct super_block *s, struct dentry
> *mntroot,
>  			  struct nfs_mount_info *mount_info)
>  {
> +	int error;
> +	unsigned long kflags = 0, kflags_out = 0;
> +	struct security_mnt_opts opts;
> +
>  	/* clone any lsm security options from the parent to the new
> sb */
>  	if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_op != NFS_SB(s)->nfs_client-
> >rpc_ops->dir_inode_ops)
>  		return -ESTALE;
> -	return security_sb_clone_mnt_opts(mount_info->cloned->sb,
> s);
> +	error = security_sb_clone_mnt_opts(mount_info->cloned->sb,
> s);
> +	if (error)
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	if (NFS_SB(s)->caps & NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL &&
> +		!(NFS_SB(mount_info->cloned->sb)->caps &
> NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL)) {
> +		memset(&opts, 0, sizeof(opts));
> +		kflags |= SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS;
> +
> +		error = security_sb_set_mnt_opts(s, &opts, kflags,
> &kflags_out);
> +		if (error)
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		if (!(kflags_out & SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS))
> +			NFS_SB(s)->caps &= ~NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL;
> +	}
> +err:
> +	return error;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_clone_sb_security);

Could this clobber a context set via context= mount option?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-26 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170404232646.GB24146@parsley.fieldses.org>
2017-05-25 21:07 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] Fix setting of security labels over NFSv4.2 Scott Mayhew
2017-05-25 21:07   ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] selinux: allow SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS to be set on an already initialized superblock Scott Mayhew
2017-05-25 21:07   ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] nfs: update labeling behavior on a superblock when submounting Scott Mayhew
2017-05-26 14:24     ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2017-05-26 15:28       ` Scott Mayhew
2017-05-26 15:42         ` Stephen Smalley
2017-06-01 14:46           ` [PATCH] security/selinux: allow security_sb_clone_mnt_opts to enable/disable native labeling behavior Scott Mayhew
2017-06-01 14:55             ` Scott Mayhew
2017-06-01 18:08               ` Stephen Smalley
2017-06-01 18:48                 ` Stephen Smalley
2017-06-01 19:40                 ` Scott Mayhew
2017-06-01 18:30             ` Stephen Smalley
2017-06-01 19:42               ` Scott Mayhew
2017-06-01 20:59               ` [PATCH v2] " Scott Mayhew
2017-06-02 12:55                 ` Stephen Smalley
2017-06-02 13:09                   ` Scott Mayhew
2017-06-05 15:45                     ` [PATCH v3] " Scott Mayhew
2017-06-05 15:55                       ` Scott Mayhew
2017-06-05 19:53                       ` Stephen Smalley
2017-06-05 21:21                       ` Paul Moore
2017-06-06  0:46                         ` J . Bruce Fields
2017-06-09 20:24                           ` Paul Moore
2017-05-30 14:38         ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] nfs: update labeling behavior on a superblock when submounting Stephen Smalley
2017-05-30 19:40           ` J . Bruce Fields
2017-05-30 19:52             ` Stephen Smalley
2017-05-26 14:48   ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] Fix setting of security labels over NFSv4.2 Stephen Smalley
2017-05-26 15:17     ` J . Bruce Fields
2017-05-26 15:18       ` J . Bruce Fields
2017-05-26 15:30     ` Scott Mayhew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495808645.12091.10.camel@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --to=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=smayhew@redhat.com \
    --cc=trondmy@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).