From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Abbas Naderi <abiusx@google.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] VSOCK: add tcp_read_sock()-like vsock_read_sock() function
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:35:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509456912.4553.12.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170630132352.32133-6-stefanha@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 14:23 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The tcp_read_sock() interface dequeues skbs and gives them to the
> caller's callback function for processing. This interface can avoid
> data copies since the caller accesses the skb instead of using its own
> receive buffer.
>
> This patch implements vsock_read_sock() for AF_VSOCK SOCK_STREAM
> sockets. The implementation is only for virtio-vsock at this time, not
> for the VMware VMCI transport. It is not zero-copy yet because the
> virtio-vsock receive queue does not consist of skbs.
>
> The tcp_read_sock()-like interface is needed for AF_VSOCK sunrpc
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 4 ++
> include/net/af_vsock.h | 5 +++
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 1 +
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 16 ++++++++
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 1 +
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 8 ++++
> 7 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> index ab13f07..d6cf428 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #include <linux/socket.h>
> #include <net/sock.h>
> #include <net/af_vsock.h>
> +#include <net/tcp.h> /* for sk_read_actor_t */
>
> #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_MIN_BUF_SIZE 128
> #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE (1024 * 256)
> @@ -126,6 +127,9 @@ int virtio_transport_notify_send_post_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> u64 virtio_transport_stream_rcvhiwat(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> bool virtio_transport_stream_is_active(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> bool virtio_transport_stream_allow(u32 cid, u32 port);
> +int virtio_transport_stream_read_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> + read_descriptor_t *desc,
> + sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
> int virtio_transport_dgram_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> struct sockaddr_vm *addr);
> bool virtio_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port);
> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> index f9fb566..85fa345 100644
> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/vm_sockets.h>
> +#include <net/tcp.h> /* for sk_read_actor_t */
>
> #include "vsock_addr.h"
>
> @@ -73,6 +74,8 @@ struct vsock_sock {
> void *trans;
> };
>
> +int vsock_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> + sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
> s64 vsock_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> s64 vsock_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> void vsock_pending_work(struct work_struct *work);
> @@ -125,6 +128,8 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> u64 (*stream_rcvhiwat)(struct vsock_sock *);
> bool (*stream_is_active)(struct vsock_sock *);
> bool (*stream_allow)(u32 cid, u32 port);
> + int (*stream_read_sock)(struct vsock_sock *, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> + sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
>
> /* Notification. */
> int (*notify_poll_in)(struct vsock_sock *, size_t, bool *);
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index 3acef3c..5128e41 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
> .stream_rcvhiwat = virtio_transport_stream_rcvhiwat,
> .stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
> .stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
> + .stream_read_sock = virtio_transport_stream_read_sock,
>
> .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index dfc8c51e..2ae94b5a 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,22 @@ static void vsock_sk_destruct(struct sock *sk)
> put_cred(vsk->owner);
> }
>
> +/* See documentation for tcp_read_sock() */
> +int vsock_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> + sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
> +{
> + struct vsock_sock *vsp = vsock_sk(sk);
> +
> + if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (sk->sk_state != SS_CONNECTED && sk->sk_state != SS_DISCONNECTING)
> + return -ENOTCONN;
> +
> + return transport->stream_read_sock(vsp, desc, recv_actor);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vsock_read_sock);
> +
> static int vsock_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> int err;
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> index 403d86e80..8264307 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> @@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> .stream_rcvhiwat = virtio_transport_stream_rcvhiwat,
> .stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
> .stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
> + .stream_read_sock = virtio_transport_stream_read_sock,
>
> .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 18e2479..510d9e1 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,72 @@ virtio_transport_stream_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_stream_dequeue);
>
> int
> +virtio_transport_stream_read_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> + read_descriptor_t *desc,
> + sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
> +{
> + struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + vvs = vsk->trans;
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> + while (!list_empty(&vvs->rx_queue)) {
> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + size_t len;
> + int used;
> +
> + pkt = list_first_entry(&vvs->rx_queue,
> + struct virtio_vsock_pkt, list);
> +
> + /* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue.
> + * Unlock rx_lock so recv_actor() can sleep.
> + */
> + spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> +
> + len = pkt->len - pkt->off;
> + skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!skb) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_nolock;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(skb_put(skb, len),
> + pkt->buf + pkt->off,
> + len);
> +
> + used = recv_actor(desc, skb, 0, len);
> +
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> +
> + if (used > 0) {
> + ret += used;
> + pkt->off += used;
> + if (pkt->off == pkt->len) {
> + virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt);
> + list_del(&pkt->list);
> + virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (used <= 0 || !desc->count)
> + break;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> +
> +out_nolock:
> + if (ret > 0)
> + virtio_transport_send_credit_update(vsk,
> + VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM, NULL);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_stream_read_sock);
> +
> +int
> virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> struct msghdr *msg,
> size_t len, int flags)
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> index 10ae782..dfbdb4c 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> @@ -646,6 +646,13 @@ static bool vmci_transport_stream_allow(u32 cid, u32 port)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static int vmci_transport_stream_read_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> + read_descriptor_t *desc,
> + sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; /* not yet implemented */
> +}
> +
> /* This is invoked as part of a tasklet that's scheduled when the VMCI
> * interrupt fires. This is run in bottom-half context but it defers most of
> * its work to the packet handling work queue.
> @@ -2061,6 +2068,7 @@ static const struct vsock_transport vmci_transport = {
> .stream_rcvhiwat = vmci_transport_stream_rcvhiwat,
> .stream_is_active = vmci_transport_stream_is_active,
> .stream_allow = vmci_transport_stream_allow,
> + .stream_read_sock = vmci_transport_stream_read_sock,
> .notify_poll_in = vmci_transport_notify_poll_in,
> .notify_poll_out = vmci_transport_notify_poll_out,
> .notify_recv_init = vmci_transport_notify_recv_init,
Do we need this for the hyperv driver as well?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-31 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 13:23 [PATCH v3 00/14] NFS: add AF_VSOCK support Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] SUNRPC: add AF_VSOCK support to addr.[ch] Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] SUNRPC: rename "TCP" record parser to "stream" parser Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] SUNRPC: abstract tcp_read_sock() in record fragment parser Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] SUNRPC: extract xs_stream_reset_state() Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] VSOCK: add tcp_read_sock()-like vsock_read_sock() function Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-10-31 13:35 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2017-11-07 13:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] SUNRPC: add AF_VSOCK support to xprtsock.c Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-07 13:46 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-14 16:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] SUNRPC: drop unnecessary svc_bc_tcp_create() helper Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-10-31 13:55 ` Jeff Layton
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] SUNRPC: add AF_VSOCK support to svc_xprt.c Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-10-31 14:10 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-07 13:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-07 14:01 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-16 15:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-16 20:53 ` Chuck Lever
2017-11-20 16:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-26 11:58 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-26 15:53 ` Chuck Lever
2017-11-27 16:46 ` Bruce Fields
2017-11-27 17:34 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-27 17:37 ` Matt Benjamin
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] SUNRPC: add AF_VSOCK backchannel support Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] NFS: add AF_VSOCK support to NFS client Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] nfsd: support vsock xprt creation Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] SUNRPC: add AF_VSOCK lock class Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] SUNRPC: vsock svcsock support Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-11-07 14:12 ` Jeff Layton
2017-11-14 14:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-06-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] SUNRPC: add AF_VSOCK support to auth.unix.ip Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-07-06 18:46 ` Abbas Naderi
2017-07-10 18:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509456912.4553.12.camel@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=abiusx@google.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).