linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix possible stack smash in nfs_idmap_read_and_verify_message
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 09:06:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1526389606.3803.4.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180417201118.17841-1-dwysocha@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 16:11 -0400, Dave Wysochanski wrote:
> In nfs_idmap_read_and_verify_message there is an unprotected sprintf
> that converts the __u32 'im_id' from struct idmap_msg to 'id_str'
> that is a stack variable of 'NFS_UINT_MAXLEN' (defined as 11).
> If a uid or gid value is > 2147483647 = 0x7fffffff we corrupt
> kernel memory by one byte and if CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG
> is set we see a stack-protector panic as follows:
> 
> [11558053.616565] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: ffffffffa05b8a8c
> 
> [11558053.639063] CPU: 6 PID: 9423 Comm: rpc.idmapd Tainted: G        W      ------------ T 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 #1
> [11558053.641990] Hardware name: Red Hat OpenStack Compute, BIOS 1.10.2-3.el7_4.1 04/01/2014
> [11558053.644462]  ffffffff818c7bc0 00000000b1f3aec1 ffff880de0f9bd48 ffffffff81685eac
> [11558053.646430]  ffff880de0f9bdc8 ffffffff8167f2b3 ffffffff00000010 ffff880de0f9bdd8
> [11558053.648313]  ffff880de0f9bd78 00000000b1f3aec1 ffffffff811dcb03 ffffffffa05b8a8c
> [11558053.650107] Call Trace:
> [11558053.651347]  [<ffffffff81685eac>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [11558053.653013]  [<ffffffff8167f2b3>] panic+0xe3/0x1f2
> [11558053.666240]  [<ffffffff811dcb03>] ? kfree+0x103/0x140
> [11558053.682589]  [<ffffffffa05b8a8c>] ? idmap_pipe_downcall+0x1cc/0x1e0 [nfsv4]
> [11558053.689710]  [<ffffffff810855db>] __stack_chk_fail+0x1b/0x30
> [11558053.691619]  [<ffffffffa05b8a8c>] idmap_pipe_downcall+0x1cc/0x1e0 [nfsv4]
> [11558053.693867]  [<ffffffffa00209d6>] rpc_pipe_write+0x56/0x70 [sunrpc]
> [11558053.695763]  [<ffffffff811fe12d>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0
> [11558053.702236]  [<ffffffff810acccc>] ? task_work_run+0xac/0xe0
> [11558053.704215]  [<ffffffff811fec4f>] SyS_write+0x7f/0xe0
> [11558053.709674]  [<ffffffff816964c9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> 
> Fix this by snprintf and a safe length based on sizeof(id_str).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Stephen Johnston <sjohnsto@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4idmap.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4idmap.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4idmap.c
> index 22dc30a679a0..a8c663f8dd99 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4idmap.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4idmap.c
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static int nfs_idmap_read_and_verify_message(struct idmap_msg *im,
>  		if (strcmp(upcall->im_name, im->im_name) != 0)
>  			break;
>  		/* Note: here we store the NUL terminator too */
> -		len = sprintf(id_str, "%d", im->im_id) + 1;
> +		len = snprintf(id_str, sizeof(id_str), "%u", im->im_id) + 1;
>  		ret = nfs_idmap_instantiate(key, authkey, id_str, len);
>  		break;
>  	case IDMAP_CONV_IDTONAME:


I did not see any reply to this and we did have one customer hit this
which caused a considerable outage of many machines.  In essence once
this happened, it became a DoS on all machines using idmapping and they
implemented a temporary workaround.

Anna / Trond - if you need me to improve the patch header or want
clarification or see a problem with it, please let me know.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-15 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-17 20:11 [PATCH] Fix possible stack smash in nfs_idmap_read_and_verify_message Dave Wysochanski
2018-05-15 13:06 ` David Wysochanski [this message]
2018-05-15 13:59   ` Trond Myklebust
2018-05-15 15:44     ` David Wysochanski
2018-05-29 13:57       ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1526389606.3803.4.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=dwysocha@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).