linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	"Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFS: limit use of ACCESS cache for negative responses
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 10:05:08 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <165274590805.17247.12823419181284113076@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <165110909570.7595.8578730126480600782.stgit@noble.brown>


Hi,
 any thoughts on these patches?

Thanks,
NeilBrown


On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, NeilBrown wrote:
> Since Commit 57b691819ee2 ("NFS: Cache access checks more aggressively")
> (Linux 4.8) NFS has cached the results of ACCESS indefinitely while the
> inode isn't changing.
> 
> This is often a good choice, but doesn't take into account the
> possibility that changes out side of the inode can change effective
> permissions.
> 
> Depending on configuration, some servers can map the user provided in
> the RPC credential to a group list at time of request.  If the group
> list for a user is changed, the result of ACCESS can change.
> 
> This is particularly a problem when extra permissions are given on the
> server.  The client may make decisions based on outdated ACCESS results
> and not even try operations which would in fact succeed.
> 
> These two patches change the ACCESS cache so that when the cache grants
> an access, that is trusted indefinitely just as it currently does.
> However when the cache denies an access, that is only trusted if the
> cached data is less than acmin seconds old.  Otherwise a new ACCESS
> request is made.
> 
> This allows additions to group membership to become effective with
> only a modest delay.
> 
> The second patch contains even more explanatory detail.
> 
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
> 
> ---
> 
> NeilBrown (2):
>       NFS: change nfs_access_get_cached() to nfs_access_check_cached()
>       NFS: limit use of ACCESS cache for negative responses
> 
> 
>  fs/nfs/dir.c           | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c      | 25 ++++++-------
>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h |  5 +--
>  3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> Signature
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28  1:37 [PATCH 0/2] NFS: limit use of ACCESS cache for negative responses NeilBrown
2022-04-28  1:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS: change nfs_access_get_cached() to nfs_access_check_cached() NeilBrown
2022-04-28  1:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] NFS: limit use of ACCESS cache for negative responses NeilBrown
2022-05-17  0:05 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2022-05-17  0:20   ` [PATCH 0/2] " Trond Myklebust
2022-05-17  0:40     ` NeilBrown
2022-05-17  0:55       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-05-17  1:05         ` NeilBrown
2022-05-17  1:14           ` Trond Myklebust
2022-05-17  1:22             ` NeilBrown
2022-05-17  1:36               ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-26 14:59                 ` Benjamin Coddington
2022-08-26 15:44                   ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-26 16:43                     ` Benjamin Coddington
2022-08-26 16:56                       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-26 18:27                         ` Benjamin Coddington
2022-08-27  0:52                           ` Trond Myklebust
2022-09-19 19:09                             ` Benjamin Coddington
2022-09-19 22:38                               ` NeilBrown
2022-09-20  1:18                                 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-26 23:39                     ` NeilBrown
2022-08-27  3:38                       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-28 23:32                         ` NeilBrown
2022-08-29 14:07                           ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-03  9:57                             ` NeilBrown
2022-09-03 15:49                               ` Trond Myklebust
2022-09-04 23:28                                 ` NeilBrown
2022-09-04 23:40                                   ` Trond Myklebust
2022-09-05  0:09                                     ` NeilBrown
2022-09-05  0:49                                       ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=165274590805.17247.12823419181284113076@noble.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).