From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
"Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFS: limit use of ACCESS cache for negative responses
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 10:05:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165274590805.17247.12823419181284113076@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <165110909570.7595.8578730126480600782.stgit@noble.brown>
Hi,
any thoughts on these patches?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, NeilBrown wrote:
> Since Commit 57b691819ee2 ("NFS: Cache access checks more aggressively")
> (Linux 4.8) NFS has cached the results of ACCESS indefinitely while the
> inode isn't changing.
>
> This is often a good choice, but doesn't take into account the
> possibility that changes out side of the inode can change effective
> permissions.
>
> Depending on configuration, some servers can map the user provided in
> the RPC credential to a group list at time of request. If the group
> list for a user is changed, the result of ACCESS can change.
>
> This is particularly a problem when extra permissions are given on the
> server. The client may make decisions based on outdated ACCESS results
> and not even try operations which would in fact succeed.
>
> These two patches change the ACCESS cache so that when the cache grants
> an access, that is trusted indefinitely just as it currently does.
> However when the cache denies an access, that is only trusted if the
> cached data is less than acmin seconds old. Otherwise a new ACCESS
> request is made.
>
> This allows additions to group membership to become effective with
> only a modest delay.
>
> The second patch contains even more explanatory detail.
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
> ---
>
> NeilBrown (2):
> NFS: change nfs_access_get_cached() to nfs_access_check_cached()
> NFS: limit use of ACCESS cache for negative responses
>
>
> fs/nfs/dir.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 25 ++++++-------
> include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 5 +--
> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Signature
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-28 1:37 [PATCH 0/2] NFS: limit use of ACCESS cache for negative responses NeilBrown
2022-04-28 1:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS: change nfs_access_get_cached() to nfs_access_check_cached() NeilBrown
2022-04-28 1:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] NFS: limit use of ACCESS cache for negative responses NeilBrown
2022-05-17 0:05 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2022-05-17 0:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Trond Myklebust
2022-05-17 0:40 ` NeilBrown
2022-05-17 0:55 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-05-17 1:05 ` NeilBrown
2022-05-17 1:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-05-17 1:22 ` NeilBrown
2022-05-17 1:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-26 14:59 ` Benjamin Coddington
2022-08-26 15:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-26 16:43 ` Benjamin Coddington
2022-08-26 16:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-26 18:27 ` Benjamin Coddington
2022-08-27 0:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-09-19 19:09 ` Benjamin Coddington
2022-09-19 22:38 ` NeilBrown
2022-09-20 1:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-26 23:39 ` NeilBrown
2022-08-27 3:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-08-28 23:32 ` NeilBrown
2022-08-29 14:07 ` Jeff Layton
2022-09-03 9:57 ` NeilBrown
2022-09-03 15:49 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-09-04 23:28 ` NeilBrown
2022-09-04 23:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-09-05 0:09 ` NeilBrown
2022-09-05 0:49 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165274590805.17247.12823419181284113076@noble.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).