Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chu Zhou <jack.wemmick@gmail.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: trondmy@kernel.org, anna@kernel.org, cel@kernel.org,
	neil@brown.name, okorniev@redhat.com, Dai.Ngo@oracle.com,
	tom@talpey.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Validate TCP record marker length before trusting it
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 15:02:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179196136183.27384.12359852241151556822@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ab4b4fd.8f0cbdd2.2427cb.7612@mx.google.com>

Ping - three weeks on with no review or ack.

Re-verified this morning: it still applies cleanly to current mainline
(v7.3-rc7), diffstat unchanged at 2 files, 44 insertions.

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/6ab4b4fd.8f0cbdd2.2427cb.7612@mx.google.com/

I went back over the error path end to end, since the whole mechanism
rests on it. xs_read_stream()'s out_err label is

	return ret != 0 ? ret : -ESHUTDOWN;

and at the point the new check fires, ret still holds the positive
byte count returned by xs_read_stream_header(), so the patch assigns
-ESHUTDOWN explicitly before branching there. That value then reaches
xs_stream_data_receive(), which calls
kernel_sock_shutdown(transport->sock, SHUT_RDWR), and the existing
transport reset machinery re-establishes the connection as described in
the commit message.

Worth restating that the failure mode is a hard hang, not a throughput
problem. The parser latched onto a bogus reclen after below-RPC
corruption, then discarded every genuine reply through the MSG_TRUNC
path while the TCP connection stayed ESTABLISHED - nothing ever
triggered a reset, and the hung task watchdog panicked the machine.
Restarting the server was the only recovery.

Two-line check plus a tracepoint, one comparison per fragment. The 16 MiB
bound is a judgement call - happy to lower it or tie it to a named
constant if that is preferred.

Thanks,

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24  5:28 [PATCH] SUNRPC: Validate TCP record marker length before trusting it Chu Zhou
2026-10-14  7:02 ` Chu Zhou [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179196136183.27384.12359852241151556822@gmail.com \
    --to=jack.wemmick@gmail.com \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox