From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
anna schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
david <david@sigma-star.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] NFS: Save 4 bytes when re-exporting
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:32:54 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1812588409.160456.1639344774221.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd3aec8fed9bab9b3e62fc2093803688b7b71682.camel@hammerspace.com>
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
> On Sun, 2021-12-12 at 22:00 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> When re-exporting, the whole struct nfs_fh is embedded in the new
>> fhandle.
>> But we need only nfs_fh->data[], nfs_fh->size is not needed.
>> So skip fs_fh->size and save a full word (4 bytes).
>> The downside is the extra memcpy() in nfs_fh_to_dentry().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>> ---
>> While investigating into improving NFS re-export I noticed that
>> we can already save 4 bytes of overhead.
>> I don't think we need to embedd the full struct nfs_fh and
>> can skip ->size.
>>
>
> NACK. This will break existing running clients. Any code to change the
> filehandle format must be accompanied with code to detect and service
> filehandles that are presented in the old format.
One possible way to distinguish between old and new formats
is looking at the length of the data.
2 * XDR_UNIT = new format (without ->size).
3 * XDR_UNIT = old format.
What do you think?
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-12 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-12 21:00 [RFC PATCH] NFS: Save 4 bytes when re-exporting Richard Weinberger
2021-12-12 21:19 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-12-12 21:32 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2021-12-12 21:51 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-12-12 21:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-12-12 21:57 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1812588409.160456.1639344774221.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=david@sigma-star.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox