From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - [9/15] - remove defconfig ptr comparisons to 0 - fs/nfsd
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:38:05 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18234.24461.192099.360005@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Joe Perches on Tuesday November 13
On Tuesday November 13, joe@perches.com wrote:
> Remove defconfig ptr comparison to 0
>
> Remove sparse warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index d019918..07b38cf 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, struct file *file,
> * flushing the data to disk is handled separately below.
> */
>
> - if (file->f_op->fsync == 0) {/* COMMIT3 cannot work */
> + if (!file->f_op->fsync) {/* COMMIT3 cannot work */
> stable = 2;
> *stablep = 2; /* FILE_SYNC */
> }
>
Personally, I would much rather these were changed to "== NULL".
Different people have different preferences on whether to use
! foo
or
foo == NULL
and the person who wrote that code is presumably showing a preference
for the later. Changing it from "== 0" to "== NULL" is clearly a
valuable improvement. Changing from "== 0" to "! " is a stylistic
change that should not be made lightly.
I personally often use and prefer the explicit comparison to NULL.
NeilBrown
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-14 2:05 [PATCH] - [9/15] - remove defconfig ptr comparisons to 0 - fs/nfsd Joe Perches
2007-11-14 2:38 ` Neil Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18234.24461.192099.360005@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox