From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFSD: Remove NFSD_TCP kernel build option Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:05:56 +1100 Message-ID: <18343.64708.19074.639419@notabene.brown> References: <20080205000442.18602.29035.stgit@manray.1015granger.net> <47A7AB89.7020709@melbourne.sgi.com> <1202170754.28484.57.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <47A7AE03.10401@melbourne.sgi.com> <4BE5A1AE-DB3B-4796-B6BD-5691930258C8@oracle.com> <47A7F8F3.3020907@melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chuck Lever , Trond Myklebust , bfields@citi.umich.edu, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Banks Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51198 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751747AbYBEGGA (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 01:06:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: message from Greg Banks on Tuesday February 5 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday February 5, gnb-cP1dWloDopni96+mSzHFpQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org wrote: > > > > What might make sense is to remove NFSD_TCP, but add NFSD_UDP, > > defaulting to Y. > > > > Then in a year or two we can change the default to N. > > > Fine by me. I, on the other hand, think we should leave support for UDP and TCP in the kernel indefinitely and rely on the 'rpc.nfsd' tool to choose what to listen to. NeilBrown