From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Steve Dickson" <SteveD@redhat.com>,
"Christian Surchi" <csurchi@debian.org>,
"Rasmus Bøg Hansen"
<rasmus-tUP8e6pgWdNlY7y4Fx5NiA@public.gmane.org>,
492970@bugs.debian.org,
"Linux NFS Mailing List" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux NFSv4 mailing list" <nfsv4@linux-nfs.org>
Subject: Re: (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released)
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 21:43:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18581.39391.324920.100038@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from J. Bruce Fields on Saturday August 2
On Saturday August 2, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:15:33PM +1000, An=EDbal Monsalve Salazar w=
rote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:13:19AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> > >I just cut the 1.1.3 nfs-utils release. Unfortunately I'm having
> > >issues accessing my kernel.org account so for the moment the=20
> > >tar ball is only available on SourceForge:
> > >
> > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/nfs
> > >[...]=20
> >=20
> > 1.1.3 clients don't work with a 1.0.10 server anymore.
>=20
> Very weird--it might make sense if upgrading nfs-utils broke the moun=
t
> itself, but here it seems the mount is succeeding and subsequent file
> access (which I'd expect to only involve the in-kernel client code) i=
s
> failing. Maybe there's some difference in the mount options? What d=
oes
> /proc/self/mounts say? I assume these are all v2 or v3 mounts?
I'm guessing v4 and that idmapd is causing problems. I cannot see any
other possible cause (not that this one seems likely).
If we can get a "tcpdump -s0 -port 2049" of the traffic it might help.
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-03 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 7:13 nfs-utils-1.1.3 released Steve Dickson
2008-07-29 17:21 ` Steve Dickson
2008-08-01 13:15 ` (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released) Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
[not found] ` <20080801131533.GN14057-ePWG1nzy00eujY+JMLXK6WCv5UukjcD9wsqeKsqY1Ps@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-02 17:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20080802172529.GC30454@fieldses.org>
2008-08-03 11:43 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2008-08-03 12:37 ` Paul Collins
[not found] ` <87myjul1fk.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-03 15:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-04 15:32 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-04 20:55 ` Paul Collins
[not found] ` <87d4ko5wlx.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-05 15:20 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-05 19:28 ` Bug#492970: " Rasmus Bøg Hansen
2008-08-06 16:21 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-06 18:21 ` Sergey Bolshakov
2008-08-06 21:24 ` (was: nfs-utils-1.1.3 released) Chuck Lever
2008-08-07 15:05 ` Bug#492970: " Lucas Nussbaum
2008-08-07 16:29 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-09 1:06 ` Chuck Lever
2008-08-10 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-26 11:10 ` Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18581.39391.324920.100038@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=492970@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=csurchi@debian.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=rasmus-tUP8e6pgWdNlY7y4Fx5NiA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).