public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Confused about BUG_ON in rpcb_getport_async
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:27:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18592.62730.840231.108375@notabene.brown> (raw)


Hi 
 I have a report of a the BUG_ON in rpcb_getport_clnt being
 triggered.  This is:
	/* Autobind on cloned rpc clients is discouraged */
	BUG_ON(clnt->cl_parent != clnt);

 It looks to me that while they might be discouraged, they are not
 prevented and so having the BUG_ON is wrong.

 When rpc_clone_client creates a clone, it sets cl_autobind to 0,
 and gives the new client a reference to the same cl_xprt as the
 original client.

 The only effect of cl_autobind is to prevent rpc_force_rebind from
 clearing the BOUND flag on ->cl_xprt.
 So while a call to rpc_force_rebind on the clone will not clear that
 flag, a call on the original client will clear that flag.

 So a cloned client can still end up with a ->cl_xprt with the BOUND
 flag clear.

 So call_bind (which is present in the call trace under the oops) can
 find that !xprt_bound, even when the client is a cloned client.

 When this happens, ->rpcbind, which is rpcb_getport_clnt, goes BOOM.

 What should happen when a clone client finds that its transport is no
 longer bound?  Should rpc_getport_async just do
    clnt = task->tk_client->cl_parent;
 ??

Perplexed,
NeilBrown

             reply	other threads:[~2008-08-12  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-12  2:27 Neil Brown [this message]
     [not found] ` <18592.62730.840231.108375-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-12 20:32   ` Confused about BUG_ON in rpcb_getport_async Trond Myklebust
2008-08-13 23:45     ` Neil Brown
     [not found]       ` <18595.29231.61262.220929-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-14  0:10         ` Trond Myklebust
2008-08-14  2:26           ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18592.62730.840231.108375@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox