From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Confused about BUG_ON in rpcb_getport_async
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:27:22 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18592.62730.840231.108375@notabene.brown> (raw)
Hi
I have a report of a the BUG_ON in rpcb_getport_clnt being
triggered. This is:
/* Autobind on cloned rpc clients is discouraged */
BUG_ON(clnt->cl_parent != clnt);
It looks to me that while they might be discouraged, they are not
prevented and so having the BUG_ON is wrong.
When rpc_clone_client creates a clone, it sets cl_autobind to 0,
and gives the new client a reference to the same cl_xprt as the
original client.
The only effect of cl_autobind is to prevent rpc_force_rebind from
clearing the BOUND flag on ->cl_xprt.
So while a call to rpc_force_rebind on the clone will not clear that
flag, a call on the original client will clear that flag.
So a cloned client can still end up with a ->cl_xprt with the BOUND
flag clear.
So call_bind (which is present in the call trace under the oops) can
find that !xprt_bound, even when the client is a cloned client.
When this happens, ->rpcbind, which is rpcb_getport_clnt, goes BOOM.
What should happen when a clone client finds that its transport is no
longer bound? Should rpc_getport_async just do
clnt = task->tk_client->cl_parent;
??
Perplexed,
NeilBrown
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-12 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-12 2:27 Neil Brown [this message]
[not found] ` <18592.62730.840231.108375-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-12 20:32 ` Confused about BUG_ON in rpcb_getport_async Trond Myklebust
2008-08-13 23:45 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18595.29231.61262.220929-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-14 0:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-08-14 2:26 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18592.62730.840231.108375@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox