From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
To: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: question on kernel stack trace
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:46:32 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1894283666.7881272.1519209992729.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> (raw)
On one of our nodes we got the following stack trace:
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: updatedb D 000000000000000f 0 32087 32081 0x00000080
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: ffff880852d13a88 0000000000000082 0000000000000000 ffffffffa00bfe13
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: 0000000000000050 0000000300000001 000d5a7576495a7a 0000000000000286
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: 0000000000000286 00000001dfd51213 ffff8810207c5068 ffff880852d13fd8
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: Call Trace:
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa00bfe13>] ? ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x83/0x1d0 [ext4]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa029b1e4>] ? __rpc_sleep_on_priority+0xf4/0x330 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa029a5b0>] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0xa0 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa029a5f2>] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x42/0xa0 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff8154ca7f>] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa0294217>] ? xprt_reserve_xprt+0x87/0x110 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa029a5b0>] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0xa0 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff8154cb28>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0x90
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff810a7220>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x50
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa029ab35>] __rpc_execute+0xf5/0x350 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff810a7027>] ? bit_waitqueue+0x17/0xd0
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa029adf1>] rpc_execute+0x61/0xa0 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa0291475>] rpc_run_task+0x75/0x90 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa0291592>] rpc_call_sync+0x42/0x70 [sunrpc]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa035cf2e>] _nfs4_call_sync+0x3e/0x40 [nfs]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa035574c>] _nfs4_proc_getattr+0xac/0xc0 [nfs]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa0358796>] nfs4_proc_getattr+0x56/0x80 [nfs]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa033e293>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xe3/0x220 [nfs]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffffa033f12e>] nfs_getattr+0xde/0x210 [nfs]
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff811a0391>] vfs_getattr+0x51/0x80
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff811a01d4>] ? cp_new_stat+0xe4/0x100
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff811a0424>] vfs_fstatat+0x64/0xa0
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff811a04ce>] vfs_lstat+0x1e/0x20
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff811a04f4>] sys_newlstat+0x24/0x50
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff81556627>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x187/0x220
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff81556620>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x180/0x220
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff810eeef7>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff8155660b>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x16b/0x220
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff81556604>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x164/0x220
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff815565fd>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x15d/0x220
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff815565f6>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x156/0x220
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff815565ef>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0x14f/0x220
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff815566d6>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Feb 19 16:55:53 nafhh kernel: [<ffffffff8155656a>] ? system_call_after_swapgs+0xca/0x220
I am surprised, that top of the stack trace is in ext4 module. Can some one put a light on it?
Thanks in advance,
Tigran.
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-21 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-21 10:46 Mkrtchyan, Tigran [this message]
2018-02-21 19:44 ` question on kernel stack trace David Wysochanski
2018-02-21 21:10 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2018-02-21 21:33 ` David Wysochanski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1894283666.7881272.1519209992729.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de \
--to=tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).